How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- Nintex starts near $25,000 per year with per-workflow billing, and renewals rise as workflow usage grows, so alternatives compete on pricing model as much as features.
- NITRO Studio at $5,988 per year for 100 users is the cheapest SharePoint-specific replacement, with flat-rate annual pricing instead of per-workflow billing.
- Microsoft Power Automate at $15 per user per month suits Microsoft shops, while Monday.com at $9 per user per month is the easiest start for small teams.
- Migrating off Nintex means rebuilding workflows, since Nintex workflows cannot be directly exported and imported, so budget 90 days for a mid-size migration.
- Workflow software manages human processes such as approvals and handoffs, while Zapier-style tools move data between apps, and most growing companies need both.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 NITRO Studio | SharePoint replacement, flat rate | $5,988 per year | No |
 Microsoft Power Automate | Microsoft ecosystem automation | $15 per user per month | No |
 Kissflow | Mid-market process automation | $1,500 per month | No |
 Monday.com | Small team workflow start | $9 per user per month | Yes |
 Pipefy | Structured intake and approvals | Free | Yes |
 Process Street | Documented SOPs and checklists | See website | No |
 Tallyfy | Process tracking and approvals | $50 per month | No |
 Camunda | Developer-led process automation | Free | Yes |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
The best Nintex alternatives
Starting price$5,988 per year
Free planNo
NITRO Studio by Crow Canyon Software is the most cost-effective alternative for SharePoint environments, with flat-rate annual pricing starting at $5,988 per year for 100 users, versus Nintex's per-workflow model. For organizations with many automated workflows, the flat-rate model typically delivers substantial savings at renewal, since Nintex costs rise as workflow usage grows.
The drag-and-drop Visual Workflow Designer accelerates rebuilding, and Crow Canyon's professional services team provides migration support. Most mid-size migrations can be scoped and completed within a 90-day window, which sets a realistic timeline for planning.
The SharePoint focus is the limit: NITRO suits SharePoint shops, not teams needing a general BPM suite across many systems. Pick NITRO when SharePoint is home and flat-rate pricing matters. Pick a general platform when workflows span many systems.
What we like- Flat-rate annual pricing, not per-workflow
- Drag-and-drop Visual Workflow Designer
- SharePoint-native
Watch out for- SharePoint-focused, not a general BPM suite
- Migration still requires rebuilding workflows
- Custom quote beyond base tier
Starting price$15 per user per month
Free planNo
Microsoft Power Automate is the low-code automation tool for Microsoft shops, integrating with Microsoft 365 to automate workflows and repetitive tasks. Cloud workflows start at $15 per user per month, with AI Builder, task mining, and pre-built templates for common processes.
The Microsoft integration is the draw: approvals in Teams, forms in SharePoint, and data in Excel flow without custom connectors. For a team already licensed for Microsoft 365, Power Automate often costs less than a separate BPM platform.
Unattended bot pricing at $150 per bot per month adds up for heavy automation, and the tool is Microsoft-first. Pick Power Automate when Microsoft 365 dominates. Pick a neutral platform when workflows span many vendors.
What we like- Deep Microsoft 365 integration
- Cloud workflows and AI Builder
- Pre-built templates
Watch out for- $150 per bot per month for unattended bots
- Microsoft-first
- Complex licensing tiers
#3Kissflow
Best for: Mid-market process automation4.3/5 on
G2 (590 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit kissflow.com
Starting price$1,500 per month
Free planNo
Kissflow is a mid-market process automation platform with customizable workflows, rated 4.3 in comparison data and cited among the top Nintex alternatives. It leans toward business process management, with formal process modeling and optimization alongside workflow execution.
The mid-market fit suits companies that outgrew simple workflow tools but do not need enterprise BPM pricing. Customizable workflows adapt to approvals, intake, and cross-department processes without developer effort.
The $1,500 per month entry excludes small teams, and SharePoint depth trails NITRO. Pick Kissflow when mid-market process automation leads. Pick NITRO when SharePoint leads.
What we like- Customizable workflows
- Mid-market fit
- Process automation strength
Watch out for- $1,500 per month entry is steep for small teams
- Enterprise features need higher tiers
- Less SharePoint depth
#4Monday.com
Best for: Small team workflow start4.7/5 on
G2 (17,182 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit monday.com
Starting price$9 per user per month
Free planYes
Monday.com at $9 per user per month billed annually is the easiest start for most small teams, with a free plan to test before paying. Visual boards, automations, and templates cover approvals, requests, and handoffs without BPM complexity.
The ease of use is the point: a small team can build a working approval process in an afternoon, then extend it as needs grow. That low friction beats formal BPM tools that demand process modeling expertise upfront.
Monday.com handles workflow management, not formal BPM with notation such as BPMN and compliance modeling, so regulated processes may need more. Pick Monday.com when a small team needs workflow fast. Pick Kissflow when formal process management leads.
What we like- Easiest start for small teams
- Free plan to test
- Visual boards and automations
Watch out for- Workflow management, not formal BPM
- Costs rise with users
- Less process modeling depth
#5Pipefy
Best for: Structured intake and approvals4.6/5 on
G2 (231 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit pipefy.com
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
Pipefy offers a free Starter plan, making it the better fit when the need is structured intake and approvals rather than general project work. Intake forms feed approval pipelines with clear stages, owners, and deadlines, which suits HR, finance, and operations requests.
The structured pipeline model keeps requests visible: each intake moves through defined stages, and bottlenecks show up in the pipeline view. That clarity beats email-based approvals, where requests vanish into inboxes.
Project breadth trails Monday.com, and higher tiers are needed for scale. Pick Pipefy when structured intake and approvals lead. Pick Monday.com when general team work leads.
What we like- Free Starter plan
- Structured intake forms
- Approval workflows
Watch out for- Less project breadth than Monday.com
- Higher tiers needed for scale
- Smaller ecosystem
#6Process Street
Best for: Documented SOPs and checklists4.6/5 on
G2 (463 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit process.st
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Process Street runs mid-size process automation near $25 per user per month in published comparisons, with checklist-driven standard operating procedures. Recurring processes, such as onboarding or monthly closes, run as checklists with owners, deadlines, and evidence at each step.
The SOP focus suits teams whose main problem is consistent execution: everyone follows the same steps, and managers see where each run stands. That discipline beats ad hoc workflows for repeatable processes.
The checklist model offers less workflow branching depth than Kissflow or Nintex, and pricing varies by tier. Pick Process Street when documented SOPs lead. Pick Kissflow when complex branching leads.
What we like- Checklist-driven SOPs
- Recurring process tracking
- Mid-size process automation
Watch out for- Checklist model, not full BPM
- Pricing varies
- Less workflow branching depth
#7Tallyfy
Best for: Process tracking and approvals4.9/5 on
G2 (6 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit tallyfy.com
Starting price$50 per month
Free planNo
Tallyfy starts from about $50 per month, making it a value pick for documented processes alongside SweetProcess at $99 per month flat for 20 users. It tracks processes with approvals, showing where each request sits and who owes the next action.
The tracking view is the draw: managers see bottlenecks without chasing people, and approval history provides an audit trail. For a small to mid-size team, that visibility covers most workflow needs without enterprise cost.
The vendor is smaller with less ecosystem breadth, and advanced BPM features trail Kissflow. Pick Tallyfy when cheap process tracking leads. Pick Kissflow when enterprise process depth leads.
What we like- From about $50 per month
- Process tracking with approvals
- Value pick for documented processes
Watch out for- Smaller vendor
- Less ecosystem breadth
- Fewer advanced BPM features
#8Camunda
Best for: Developer-led process automation4.5/5 on
G2 (327 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit camunda.com
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
Camunda is an open-architecture automation platform for developers to build and manage workflows, free for up to 5 users with paid plans at scale. Multi-language support and workflow modeling flexibility suit engineering teams that want code-level control over processes.
The open architecture integrates with existing systems through APIs, and the modeling tools support formal process notation. For a developer-led team, Camunda offers precision that no-code tools cannot match.
No-code users will struggle, since Camunda assumes developer effort for building and maintaining workflows. A pilot with one process, run alongside the existing system, reveals whether the developer effort pays off before committing the whole operation. Pick Camunda when developers own process automation. Pick a no-code tool when business users own it.
What we like- Free for up to 5 users
- Open architecture
- Developer-friendly workflow modeling
Watch out for- Developer effort required
- No-code users will struggle
- Paid plans needed at scale
How we chose
We compared tools that replace Nintex's core job, workflow and process automation, using vendor pages and 2026 comparison data. We favored published prices and marked quote-based tools as such, since Nintex itself starts near $25,000 per year with contract variation. We also split SharePoint-specific replacements from general platforms, since those buyers have different constraints.
Workflow versus BPM: which do you need
Workflow management handles the flow of tasks between people: approvals, requests, and handoffs. Business process management is the broader discipline of modeling, analyzing, and optimizing end-to-end processes, often with formal notation like BPMN and compliance requirements. Tools like Pipefy and Monday.com do workflow management, while Nintex and Kissflow lean toward BPM.
Most small businesses need workflow management, not BPM. A small team with approval bottlenecks gains more from Pipefy's free Starter or Monday.com's $9 plan than from a formal BPM platform. Mid-size companies with cross-department processes and compliance needs gain from Kissflow or Camunda.
Migration cost should factor into the choice. Nintex workflows cannot be directly exported, so every replacement means rebuilding, typically within 90 days for mid-size migrations. Choose the tool whose model matches your processes, not the one with the longest feature list, since rebuilding twice costs more than any license difference.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Nintex cost?
Nintex pricing is not publicly listed and varies by contract size, workflow count, and deployment type, with a starting figure near $25,000 per year in comparison data. Costs rise at renewal as workflow usage grows under the per-workflow model.
What is the cheapest Nintex alternative for SharePoint?
NITRO Studio by Crow Canyon Software, starting at $5,988 per year for 100 users with flat-rate annual pricing, is the most cost-effective SharePoint replacement in 2026 comparisons. Flat-rate pricing avoids the per-workflow cost growth Nintex imposes.
Does replacing Nintex require rebuilding workflows?
Yes, migrating off Nintex requires rebuilding workflows in the replacement platform, since Nintex workflows cannot be directly exported and imported. Most mid-size migrations can be scoped and completed within a 90-day window with vendor migration support.
What is the best Nintex alternative for small teams?
Monday.com at $9 per user per month billed annually is the easiest start, with a free plan to test. Pipefy's free Starter plan is better when structured intake and approvals are the main need.
Do I need workflow software or just Zapier?
Different problems. Zapier automates data movement between apps: when X happens, do Y. Workflow software manages human processes: who approves, in what order, with what proof. If work gets stuck between people, you need workflow software; if data gets stuck between apps, you need Zapier.
Which tool is best for approvals?
Pipefy's free Starter plan covers structured intake and approvals well for small teams, while Monday.com and Kissflow cover approvals at larger scale. NITRO Studio suits SharePoint-based approval workflows with flat-rate pricing.
Sources we checked (5)
- https://www.crowcanyon.com/blog/nintex-alternatives-the-cost-effective-benefits-of-replacing-nintex-with-a-smarter-solution/
- https://rankite.com/blog/best-workflow-software
- https://www.softwareadvice.com/forms-automation/nintex-process-platform-profile/alternatives/
- https://www.cflowapps.com/business-process-automation-tools/
- https://www.g2.com/compare/flowforma-process-automation-vs-nintex-nintex
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.