How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- Onfido, now part of Entrust, is the enterprise default swap, with strong mobile SDKs and sales led annual pricing.
- Sumsub is the all in one pick for fintech and crypto, from $1.35 per verification with a $149 monthly minimum, covering KYC, KYB, and AML.
- Persona suits developers: a free tier to build on, and a workflow builder instead of a fixed verification flow.
- iDenfy and Shufti Pro publish per check prices, $1.35 and $1.50, a rarity in a category that hides rates behind sales calls.
- Compliance note: no vendor transfers your obligations. KYC and AML duties stay with your business, so run your own diligence, check each provider's certifications and data handling, and test false rejection rates on your real users before signing.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 Onfido | Enterprise identity verification | See website | No |
 Sumsub | All in one KYC, KYB, and AML | $1.35 per verification | No |
 Persona | Custom verification flows for developers | Free | Yes |
 Jumio | Enterprise verification at global scale | See website | No |
 Trulioo | Global database and document checks | See website | No |
 Socure | US identity and fraud risk scoring | See website | No |
 iDenfy | Published per check pricing | $1.35 per verification | No |
 Shufti Pro | Wide country coverage with human review | $1.50 per verification | Yes |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
The best Veriff alternatives
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Onfido is the name most Veriff comparisons start with. Its Real Identity platform checks documents and faces through SDKs that feel native in consumer apps, and its acquisition by Entrust in 2024 placed it inside a broad enterprise identity portfolio. For regulated institutions that want a named, audited vendor, that consolidation is a selling point.
The trade off is access. There are no published rates, trials are by arrangement, and contracts are annual. Onfido fits mid size to enterprise companies in finance and marketplaces that can run a proper vendor process and want verification depth with enterprise backing.
What we like- Document verification and biometric liveness with polished mobile SDKs
- Part of Entrust since April 2024, adding issuance and access products around it
- Strong record with banks, fintechs, and sharing economy platforms
- Workflow tooling for different risk levels
Watch out for- Pricing is sales led with annual contracts, nothing published
- Enterprise sales cycles slow smaller buyers
- Folding into the Entrust portfolio means product direction follows a larger roadmap
#2Sumsub
Best for: All in one KYC, KYB, and AML4.6/5 on
G2 (130 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit sumsub.com
Starting price$1.35 per verification
Free planNo
Sumsub is the full compliance stack answer. Where Veriff answers "is this person real", Sumsub also answers "is this business real, is either sanctioned, and does this transaction look wrong". Its roots in crypto and fintech show in its emerging market document coverage and its speed.
The trade off is scope creep in the bill. The check is the cheap part; screening and monitoring tiers are where contracts grow. Sumsub fits fintech, crypto, gaming, and marketplace companies that would otherwise buy three compliance tools and stitch them together.
What we like- KYC, business verification, AML screening, and transaction monitoring in one platform
- Document coverage across 220 plus countries, including markets rivals handle poorly
- Basic checks from $1.35 with a $149 monthly minimum
- Reusable KYC on higher tiers cuts repeat onboarding friction
Watch out for- Compliance tier with screening costs more, around $1.85 per check with a higher minimum
- Brand recognition is thinner in North American enterprise
- Workflow customisation can get complex
#3Persona
Best for: Custom verification flows for developers4.2/5 on
G2 (48 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit withpersona.com
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
Persona treats verification as a product surface you design. Teams compose flows from components, asking different users for different proof based on risk, and change them without a vendor project. Its free tier is the category's friendliest way to prototype on real checks before committing.
The trade off is that flexibility is work. A fixed flow vendor gets a simple product live faster. Persona fits startups and product led companies, especially in marketplaces and fintech, whose onboarding funnels are a competitive surface rather than a compliance chore.
What we like- Modular building blocks for verification flows, rather than one fixed journey
- Free tier reported at up to 500 verifications a month for building and testing
- Government ID, selfie, database, and document checks combined per risk level
- Strong developer experience and documentation
Watch out for- Paid entry reported from $250 per month on annual terms
- Assembling flows takes product thought, not just an SDK drop in
- Enterprise features and screening sit on higher plans
#4Jumio
Best for: Enterprise verification at global scale4.1/5 on
G2 (38 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit jumio.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Jumio is the incumbent's incumbent. Large banks, airlines, and platforms run on it, its liveness carries recognised certifications, and its network view across transactions helps fraud teams spot repeat attackers. If your shortlist is driven by a risk committee, Jumio is usually already on it.
The trade off is weight. Small and mid size buyers will feel like the smallest account in the room. Jumio fits large, regulated organisations verifying at global scale, where the contract size buys attention and the fraud network data earns its keep.
What we like- One of the category's founding vendors, with over a billion verifications processed
- Certified liveness detection rated for deepfake resistance
- Cross transaction fraud signals through its identity graph
- Deep document coverage for global enterprises
Watch out for- Nothing about pricing is published
- Sales led annual contracts with meaningful minimums
- Integration is an enterprise project measured in weeks
#5Trulioo
Best for: Global database and document checks4.4/5 on
G2 (40 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit trulioo.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Trulioo's bet is data rather than documents. In many countries it can verify a person against official and commercial records without asking for a photo of anything, which keeps onboarding light where the data exists. Global enterprises use it to run one verification programme across very different markets.
The trade off is that database checks only work where databases do, so document fallback still matters and quality differs by market. Trulioo fits multinational companies, especially in finance and ecommerce, that need breadth of country coverage more than flow polish.
What we like- Identity data coverage across more than 190 countries through local sources
- Database verification that avoids document upload where records allow
- Strong fit for markets where documents are weak or varied
- Enterprise compliance and watchlist tooling
Watch out for- Fully sales led, expect a procurement process
- Database coverage quality varies by country, like everyone's
- Less of a consumer facing flow brand than Onfido or Veriff
#6Socure
Best for: US identity and fraud risk scoring4.5/5 on
G2 (103 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit socure.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Socure answers a different question: not just "does this ID match this face" but "how risky is this identity". Its models score applications using identity graph data, which helps US lenders approve young and thin file customers that document checks alone would stall. Approval rate, not just fraud rate, is its pitch.
The trade off is geography and shape. Outside the US its data advantage fades, and it slots into a risk stack rather than replacing a full global verification flow. Socure fits US financial services and public sector buyers who measure onboarding by good users approved.
What we like- Risk scoring built on US identity data, strong on thin file and younger applicants
- Combines verification with fraud prediction rather than documents alone
- Widely adopted by US banks, card issuers, and government programmes
- Good fit where approval rates for good users are the metric
Watch out for- US centric, so global document coverage is not its strength
- Pricing is sales led with nothing published
- A risk platform adoption, not a lightweight check
#7iDenfy
Best for: Published per check pricing4.9/5 on
G2 (242 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit idenfy.com
Starting price$1.35 per verification
Free planNo
iDenfy competes on the thing this category hates: a public price list. A small company can model its verification bill on the website, start a trial, and integrate without ever booking a demo. For teams below enterprise volume, that transparency is the feature.
The trade off is scale and brand. Risk committees at large institutions will ask harder questions of a smaller vendor. iDenfy fits startups and mid size platforms that want Veriff style checks at published prices, and the option to add screening without renegotiating a contract.
What we like- Basic checks published at $1.35 per verification with a $135 monthly minimum
- Sanctions and PEP screening priced openly as an add on
- Short free trial to test on real documents
- Liveness and document verification without a sales process
Watch out for- Smaller vendor, so enterprise support depth is still growing
- Minimums still apply, it is not pure pay as you go
- Advanced compliance features cost extra per check
Starting price$1.50 per verification
Free planYes
Shufti Pro sells reach and a safety net. Its document library covers the long tail of world IDs, and when the AI is unsure, human reviewers step in instead of the user hitting a dead end. Published per check pricing and the absence of a monthly minimum keep it accessible at low volume.
The trade off is speed on the hard cases and enterprise polish. Shufti Pro fits globally scattered user bases, travel, gaming, and marketplaces, where document variety defeats narrower libraries and a reviewed decision beats a fast rejection.
What we like- Coverage across 240 plus countries and more than 10,000 document types
- Hybrid AI and human review for hard cases
- Essentials checks from $1.50 per verification with no stated monthly minimum
- Free tier of 10 verifications a month for testing
Watch out for- Human review adds latency to edge case decisions
- Brand presence in the US enterprise market is modest
- Screening and add on pricing is not published separately
How we chose
We compared the platforms named most in 2026 verification reviews and Gartner coverage, and checked every published price against at least one dated source. Where vendors publish nothing, which is most of the enterprise tier, we wrote See website rather than repeat third party guesses as fact. We weighted document coverage, liveness and deepfake resistance, the pricing model's fit at different volumes, and what each platform does beyond the check itself. We did not run test identities through any platform, and no ordering here is a substitute for a pilot on your own users.
How to choose a Veriff alternative
Start with your regulator, not the feature list. Your KYC and AML obligations remain yours whichever vendor you pick, so confirm the provider's certifications, data residency, retention defaults, and audit rights against your compliance team's requirements, and record your own diligence. A vendor's marketing claim of compliance is not a defence you can hand to an examiner.
Then test on your traffic. Run finalists in parallel on real onboarding for a few weeks and compare the numbers that decide the contract: decision time, false rejection rate on your document mix, and cost per approved customer, not per check. Pay special attention to your hardest markets, because document libraries differ most exactly where your users are hardest to verify. Finally, price the whole stack: the check, screening, and monitoring are often three line items, and the cheapest check can build the most expensive programme.
Frequently asked questions
How much does identity verification cost per check in 2026?
Published rates run roughly from $0.80 to $1.89 per check, with monthly minimums between about $49 and $299. On this list, Sumsub starts at $1.35 per check with a $149 minimum, iDenfy at $1.35 with a $135 minimum, and Shufti Pro at $1.50 with no stated minimum. Enterprise platforms like Jumio, Onfido, and Trulioo do not publish rates and contract annually instead.
Which Veriff alternative is best for a startup?
Persona, for its free tier and buildable flows, or iDenfy and Shufti Pro for published per check pricing with modest minimums. Veriff's own model favours volume, and enterprise suites will mostly not return a startup's calls quickly. Startups should also test false rejections carefully, because a small funnel cannot afford to lose good users to strict settings.
Do these platforms handle AML and sanctions screening?
Several do, at a price. Sumsub bundles screening into its compliance tiers, iDenfy prices PEP and sanctions screening as a published add on, and Trulioo and Socure include watchlist tooling in their enterprise offers. Ask for the screening price per check in writing, because it is the second invoice buyers most often fail to budget.
How should we test a verification vendor before signing?
Pilot on your real onboarding flow, with your real document mix, for long enough to see a few thousand decisions. Measure decision speed, approval rate for users you know are legitimate, and support quality when edge cases appear. Deepfake and liveness claims should be checked against certifications, and any vendor unwilling to be tested on your data is telling you something.
Can one vendor cover every country we operate in?
Broadly, yes: Sumsub, Shufti Pro, and Jumio each cover more than 220 countries and thousands of document types. The honest limit is quality variance. Approval rates on common US and EU documents will be strong everywhere; the test is your long tail markets, which is why pilots should oversample your hardest countries rather than your easiest.
Sources we checked (0)
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.