How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- FloQast itself does not publish pricing, with third-party medians near $24,000 per year, so every alternative here needs a written quote too.
- Numeric publishes $30 per user per month and goes live in under two weeks, the fastest start on this list.
- BlackLine is the SOX benchmark for enterprises, but implementation runs three to six months and is usually partner-led.
- DOKKA Close offers a lower-cost entry for small finance teams, with estimates near $50 to $150 per month.
- The trigger for dedicated close software is headcount: past two or three people touching the close, spreadsheets break.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 BlackLine | Enterprise SOX close | See website | No |
 Numeric | Fast AI-assisted close | $30 per user/month | No |
 Trintech Adra | High-volume matching | See website | No |
 DOKKA Close | Small team close automation | See website | Free trial |
 Planful | Close plus planning in one platform | See website | No |
 ReconArt | Reconciliation depth | See website | No |
 SolveXia | Automation for finance teams | See website | No |
 Workiva | Connected reporting and close | See website | No |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
The best FloQast alternatives
#1BlackLine
Best for: Enterprise SOX close4.5/5 on
G2 (1,070 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit blackline.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
BlackLine is the benchmark for enterprise financial close, especially where SOX controls matter. Its signature feature, auto-certification, automatically certifies clean, low-risk reconciliations that meet defined rules, so accountants review only exceptions. That lever cuts close time more than any other single feature at enterprise scale.
The platform covers account reconciliation, transaction matching, journal entry controls, variance analysis, and task management, with full audit trails that Big Four auditors know well because their consulting arms implement it. For a large enterprise with complex accounting, intercompany activity, and audit scrutiny, BlackLine is the safe choice.
The cost is the barrier. Third-party comparisons place BlackLine totals from $150,000 to $500,000 per year for large deployments, and implementation runs three to six months, almost always partner-led. Smaller teams will find it overkill. Pick BlackLine when controls and audit depth justify enterprise cost. Pick a mid-market tool when they do not.
What we like- Auto-certification for clean reconciliations
- Full audit trails
- Big Four auditors know it well
Watch out for- Very high cost
- Three to six month implementation
- Dated, click-heavy interface
#2Numeric
Best for: Fast AI-assisted close4.8/5 on
G2 (66 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit numeric.io
Starting price$30 per user/month
Free planNo
Numeric is the fastest route to a managed close, going live in under two weeks with an accountant-led setup: connect the general ledger, connect file storage, and mirror the checklist. Its published price of $30 per user per month stands out in a category where rivals hide pricing, though higher tiers move to quotes near a $15,000 yearly median.
The platform covers close checklists, account reconciliations, flux analysis, and transaction monitors, with AI assistance that flags unusual movements. For a team whose biggest pain is close coordination and variance explanation, Numeric's AI layer adds value that checklist-only tools lack.
The limits are scope and scale. Journal entry automation posts to NetSuite and nowhere else, and the review base, near 65 G2 reviews against FloQast's roughly 1,400, reflects a younger vendor. Pick Numeric when speed and AI-assisted close matter most. Pick a larger vendor when broad ERP coverage is required.
What we like- Published pricing
- Live in under two weeks
- AI-assisted reconciliations and flux analysis
Watch out for- Quote-based at higher tiers
- Journal automation posts to NetSuite only
- Smaller review base than FloQast
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Trintech Adra serves mid-size and large enterprises with high-volume transaction matching. Where a team reconciles thousands of transactions monthly, Adra's matching engine clears the bulk automatically and surfaces only exceptions for review. Balance sheet reconciliations, close tasks, and journal entries complete the close workflow.
Reviewers describe Trintech as valuable for automating high-volume reconciliations, but several note it can feel expensive for smaller enterprises. That pattern fits the category: matching depth costs money, and the payoff arrives only when transaction volume justifies it.
Pick Adra when transaction volume is the bottleneck. A team with modest volumes will get the same close done cheaper with Numeric or DOKKA Close, while a team drowning in matches will find Adra's engine worth the quote.
What we like- High-volume transaction matching
- Balance sheet reconciliations
- Close tasks and journals
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing
- Can feel expensive for smaller enterprises
- Implementation effort at scale
Starting priceSee website
Free planFree trial
DOKKA Close targets smaller finance teams with AI-powered close automation at a lower cost. Public 2026 estimates place it near $50 to $150 per month, with first-year totals near $6,000 to $18,000 for ten users, well below FloQast's reported range. Setup is quick, and the interface favors ease over depth.
The platform covers close task management, reconciliations, and document handling with automation that suits a team moving off spreadsheets. For a small business whose close currently runs on Excel and email, DOKKA Close offers a structured upgrade without enterprise cost.
The trade is depth. DOKKA Close may lack the advanced controls, intercompany handling, and audit features of BlackLine or FloQast, and it is a newer entrant, so its track record is shorter. Pick DOKKA Close when cost and speed matter most. Pick an enterprise tool when controls and scale dominate.
What we like- Low estimated entry cost
- Fast setup
- AI-powered automation for smaller teams
Watch out for- May lack advanced enterprise features
- Newer entrant
- Estimates, not published prices
#5Planful
Best for: Close plus planning in one platform4.3/5 on
G2 (509 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit planful.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Planful combines close management with financial planning, consolidation, and reporting in one platform. For a finance team that wants reconciliations, close task management, intercompany eliminations, and currency translation alongside budgets and forecasts, that consolidation removes a second system.
The platform suits mid-size to large finance teams that already plan in a dedicated tool or want to. Close features sit alongside planning rather than dominating the product, so the evaluation should weigh both halves, not just the close checklist.
Pricing is quote-based with no price on the website. Pick Planful when close and planning belong together in one purchase. Pick a close specialist when the close alone is the problem and planning already has a home.
What we like- Close, consolidation, and planning in one system
- Intercompany eliminations
- Currency translation
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing
- Broader platform means longer evaluation
- Close features share focus with planning
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
ReconArt focuses on full account reconciliation with controls: balance-sheet accounts tied to supporting detail, with preparer and reviewer sign-offs. That scope goes beyond bank reconciliation, covering accruals, prepaids, and intercompany accounts that spreadsheet closes handle badly.
Third-party data suggests entry points near $12,000 to $40,000 per year for dedicated reconciliation tools in this group, so request a written quote for your account count. The platform suits teams under audit scrutiny where every reconciliation needs a defensible trail.
ReconArt's brand recognition is narrower than BlackLine or FloQast, and implementation needs planning around account structures. Pick ReconArt when reconciliation depth is the core requirement. Pick a broader close platform when task management and journals matter equally.
What we like- Full account reconciliation with controls
- Transaction matching
- Preparer and reviewer sign-offs
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing
- Narrower brand recognition
- Implementation needs planning
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
SolveXia automates finance processes that currently run on spreadsheets, including reconciliations, reporting, and data preparation. It connects to common ERPs and data sources, runs scheduled processes, and produces audit-ready outputs without manual copying between systems.
The value shows for teams whose close pain is manual data work rather than task coordination. When accountants spend days pulling, cleaning, and matching data before they can even start reviewing, automation pays back faster than a checklist tool.
SolveXia's close-checklist depth is thinner than FloQast's, and automation needs process mapping before it delivers, so the first month involves design work. Pick SolveXia when manual processes are the bottleneck. Pick a close manager when coordination and sign-offs are the bottleneck.
What we like- Automation for reconciliations and reporting
- Connects to common ERPs
- Reduces manual spreadsheet work
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing
- Less close-checklist depth than FloQast
- Needs process mapping first
#8Workiva
Best for: Connected reporting and close4.5/5 on
G2 (2,147 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit workiva.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Workiva connects the close to reporting and filings in one platform, so numbers that start in the close flow through to board reports and regulatory documents without re-keying. Collaboration, version control, and audit trails cover the full reporting chain, which suits enterprises where the close feeds external disclosure.
The platform's enterprise base is large, with thousands of reviews, and its strength is that connected chain rather than any single close feature. For a team whose close ends in filings and investor reports, Workiva removes the handoff gap between accounting and reporting.
Pricing is quote-based, and the platform is broader than close alone, so evaluation takes longer. Pick Workiva when reporting and filings are part of the close problem. Pick a close specialist when the close itself is the only gap.
What we like- Connected reporting across close and filings
- Collaboration and audit trails
- Strong enterprise base
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing
- Broader platform than close alone
- Implementation effort for full deployment
How we chose
We compared tools that replace FloQast's core jobs, close task management, account reconciliation, and journal controls, using vendor pages and 2026 comparison data. We favored published prices where available, and we marked quote-based tools and third-party estimates as such rather than presenting estimates as vendor prices. We also weighed implementation time heavily, since a tool that takes six months to deploy costs more in delay than its license suggests.
Bank reconciliation versus account reconciliation
Buyers often confuse two different jobs. Bank reconciliation matches the bank feed to the books: every deposit and withdrawal accounted for. QuickBooks and Xero do this well, and it is enough when the close is one person matching bank feeds.
Account reconciliation is broader. Balance-sheet accounts such as accruals, prepaids, and intercompany balances get tied to supporting detail, with preparer and reviewer sign-offs. FloQast, BlackLine, Adra, Numeric, and ReconArt do full account reconciliation with controls, which is what audit scrutiny demands.
The trigger for dedicated software is headcount. Past two or three people touching the close, the spreadsheet process breaks: versions multiply, sign-offs go missing, and auditors ask questions nobody can answer quickly. If your close is one person and bank feeds, your accounting tool is enough. If it involves multiple preparers, dozens of balance-sheet accounts, or intercompany activity, dedicated software pays for itself in the first close.
Frequently asked questions
How much does FloQast cost?
FloQast does not publish pricing. Third-party sources place entry near $12,000 per year, with a Vendr median near $24,000 per year and small deployments near $30,000 to $50,000 per year, plus implementation from $5,000 to $30,000. Confirm figures during a sales call.
What is the cheapest FloQast alternative?
DOKKA Close carries the lowest estimated entry, near $50 to $150 per month in public 2026 estimates. Numeric publishes $30 per user per month, which is transparent but scales with users. Both need written quotes for a firm total.
How fast can I go live with a close tool?
Numeric goes live in under two weeks, and FloQast deployments run four to six weeks. BlackLine takes three to six months, usually partner-led. DOKKA Close and SolveXia sit in between, depending on process complexity.
Do I need dedicated close software or is QuickBooks enough?
QuickBooks and Xero handle bank reconciliation well. Dedicated close software earns its cost when month-end involves multiple preparers and reviewers, dozens of balance-sheet accounts, intercompany activity, or audit scrutiny.
What is auto-certification?
Auto-certification automatically certifies clean, low-risk reconciliations that meet defined rules, so accountants review only exceptions. BlackLine's version is the signature example. Mid-market tools offer auto-matching with reviewer sign-off, while true auto-certification with audit controls is an enterprise-tier feature.
Which alternative is best for SOX compliance?
BlackLine is the SOX benchmark, with controls, journal entry governance, and audit trails that Big Four auditors know well. FloQast also serves SOX teams, but BlackLine's compliance depth scores highest in independent comparisons.
Sources we checked (6)
- https://www.itqlick.com/floqast/competitors
- https://rankite.com/blog/best-reconciliation-software
- https://www.auditfriendly.co/software/floqast
- https://www.numeric.io/blog/floqast-pricing
- https://numeric.io
- https://blackline.com
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.