How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Rankite is independent; if a vendor ever pays for a featured spot, that listing is clearly labeled Partner.
Key takeaways
- Award Force is the premium all-rounder: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, multilingual, with optional privacy-first AI for entry assessment.
- OpenWater is the pick for associations and universities already living in iMIS, Salesforce, or another AMS/CRM it integrates with natively.
- Submittable is strongest when awards sit inside a broader grants, scholarships, or corporate giving program.
- Evalato (from €2,500 per program, free testing) and Judgify (free for free events) are the value picks for new or small programs.
- If you also need to find applicants, YouNoodle pairs its management platform with a 400,000-plus entrepreneur network that actively promotes your program.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
Award Force | prestigious awards programs where trust and polish matter most | See website | No |
OpenWater | associations, societies, and universities managing awards alongside grants or scholarships | See website | No |
Submittable | foundations, governments, and companies running grants, scholarships, or CSR programs | See website | No |
Evalato | organizers who want to launch a polished program fast without enterprise budget | €2,500/program | Yes (free testing) |
Reviewr | organizations that want simple, no-drama submission collection and review | See website | No |
Judgify | contests, abstract competitions, and awards events of any size | See website | Yes (free for free events) |
Good Grants | grantmakers who want sophisticated software without enterprise pricing | See website | No |
YouNoodle | startup competitions, accelerators, and innovation challenges | $199/month | No |
SurveyMonkey Apply | universities and nonprofits that want polished application portals with automation | See website | No |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Request a listing
How we chose
We shortlisted platforms purpose-built for collecting applications or entries and running them through formal review: awards, grants, scholarships, pitch competitions, and innovation challenges. General form builders and pure survey tools were excluded, since they lack judging portals, scoring workflows, and results management. For each candidate we checked the vendor's own site for current features and pricing, noted public pricing where the vendor publishes it, and looked for third-party validation such as G2 leadership badges and documented customer bases. Quote-based pricing is marked "See website" rather than guessed from resellers.
The best awards management software
#1
Award Force
Best for: prestigious awards programs where trust and polish matter most
Visit awardforce.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Award Force calls itself the world's leading awards platform, and the client list does a lot of the talking: BBC, NASA, Microsoft, the Commonwealth, the Eurovision Song Contest. The platform covers the full lifecycle from program setup and entry collection through judging, scoring, results management, and reporting, all with the kind of branding polish that prestige programs demand.
Security is the headline differentiator. SOC 2 Type II compliance, ISO/IEC 27001 certification, PCI-DSS, and data residency options in the region of your choice make it the default choice for government and institutional programs handling sensitive submissions. Unlimited program managers, judges, entrants, and file uploads come with every plan, with entry caps instead of user caps. Newer additions include optional privacy-first AI tools that run inside Award Force's own VPC with no data retention, for pattern analysis and human-in-the-loop assessment.
What we like- Exceptional security credentials (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, GDPR)
- 40-plus native translations
- Unlimited judges, entrants, and file uploads at no extra cost
Watch out for- Pricing is quote-based with no public tiers
- The depth of configuration can be more than small programs need
- Full power requires an onboarding investment
#2
OpenWater
Best for: associations, societies, and universities managing awards alongside grants or scholarships
Visit getopenwater.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
OpenWater is an application and review management platform built for the nonprofit and higher-education world. It handles awards, grants, scholarships, fellowships, and abstract submissions in one system, with custom-branded upload portals, online and in-person judging modes, automated email marketing, and entry-fee collection through PayPal and Authorize.net.
Its biggest advantage is integration depth. Where most competitors treat CRM connectivity as an afterthought, OpenWater is built to sit alongside iMIS, Avectra, Personify, Dynamics, and Salesforce, syncing submission and judging data with the systems associations already run. The company, part of Advanced Solutions International, earned G2 Winter 2025 Leader badges for both awards and scholarship management plus a "Users Love Us" recognition. If your awards program lives inside a membership organization, that ecosystem fit matters more than feature checklists.
What we like- Deep integrations with iMIS, Salesforce, Avectra, and other AMS/CRM platforms
- G2 Winter 2025 Leader in awards and scholarship management
- Serves 1,000-plus associations
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing
- Narrower awards-only focus than Award Force
- Configuration nuances reward an experienced admin
#3
Submittable
Best for: foundations, governments, and companies running grants, scholarships, or CSR programs
Visit submittable.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Submittable is a submission management platform used by foundations, nonprofits, corporations, and governments to collect, review, and manage applications, submissions, and awards. It is the scale leader in its segment: programs like Washington State small business grants and Minnesota frontline worker relief ran on it, and it holds a Texas DIR contract for state agencies.
The strength is the end-to-end lifecycle. Multi-stage review, identity verification for fraud prevention, CRM-like applicant views, tailored award agreements, real-time budget tracking, and impact reporting sit in one product. For organizations that run grants alongside awards, or CSR programs alongside scholarships, consolidating on one platform cuts training and integration costs. Pure awards programs should weigh whether they need all of it.
What we like- Trusted by 45-plus US state governments
- Full post-award lifecycle with payments and reporting
- Drag-and-drop form builder with fraud prevention
Watch out for- Quote-based enterprise pricing
- Broad platform can be more than a pure awards program needs
- Awards are one of several modules, not the whole product
#4
Evalato
Best for: organizers who want to launch a polished program fast without enterprise budget
Visit evalato.com
Starting price€2,500/program
Free planYes (free testing)
Evalato is the next-generation awards management platform from Bulgaria/Spain that punches above its weight: 7,000-plus customers across 80-plus countries, including the UN, Reuters, and the University of Oxford. The vendor's own FAQ states flexible per-program pricing from €2,500 for the Grow plan up to €5,500 for Pro, with free unlimited testing and no credit card required.
The product covers launch to results: pre-made templates, a drag-and-drop form builder, an embeddable FastApply portal, payments in 30-plus methods and 160-plus currencies, multiple evaluation rounds with six voting types, optional public voting with social login, and a PreciseSelect system for picking winners. With 40-plus supported languages and GDPR/CCPA compliance, it is the strongest value alternative to the quote-based enterprise tier for mid-size programs.
What we like- Genuinely usable templates and a FastApply submission portal
- Six voting types and PreciseSelect winner picking
- Public per-program pricing starting at €2,500
Watch out for- Entry caps on lower tiers (Grow fits small programs)
- Add-on costs for entry volume
- Smaller brand footprint than Award Force or Submittable
#5
Reviewr
Best for: organizations that want simple, no-drama submission collection and review
Visit reviewr.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Reviewr, from Nebraska, offers applicant submission management software that streamlines collecting, managing, and reviewing submissions across awards, grants, scholarships, and competitions. Its feature set hits the category essentials: entrant and entry management, entry fee processing, blind judging, scoring, voting management, and white-labeled applicant and reviewer portals.
The pitch is operational simplicity rather than breadth. Where enterprise platforms sell ecosystems, Reviewr sells getting submissions collected and fairly reviewed without fuss, with compliance-friendly evaluation workflows and data-driven decision tools. Organizations frustrated by spreadsheet judging but wary of enterprise procurement timelines should include it in the demo round. Pricing is quote-based, so smaller programs should ask directly about entry-level packages.
What we like- Covers awards, grants, scholarships, and competitions in one product
- Blind judging and scoring built in
- Reviewer management with audit trails
Watch out for- No public pricing
- Smaller company (1-10 employees) with a thinner integration ecosystem
- Brand recognition lags the category leaders
#6
Judgify
Best for: contests, abstract competitions, and awards events of any size
Visit judgify.me
Starting priceSee website
Free planYes (free for free events)
Judgify, from Singapore, is a beginning-to-end solution for online awards, contests, and abstract management. The distinctive offer: Judgify is free for contests that offer free tickets, so community and non-profit competitions can run the full platform at no cost. The site states registration is free to get started.
Beyond entries and judging, Judgify bundles extras competitors charge for: a drag-and-drop landing page builder with Google Analytics snapshots, flexible judge assignment (random, manual, or by category) with multi-criteria scoring, public voting, comprehensive reports, and even a ticketing module for selling tables and tickets to the awards ceremony itself. Hundreds of events worldwide have run on it, including work with Clarion Events and Mubadala. For organizers who also sell ceremony tickets, the all-in-one story is compelling.
What we like- Free for events with free tickets
- Drag-and-drop site builder and entry forms
- Awards ceremony ticketing module included
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing for paid programs
- Product history skews toward contests rather than grants
- Branding is less premium than Award Force
#7
Good Grants
Best for: grantmakers who want sophisticated software without enterprise pricing
Visit goodgrants.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Good Grants, from Australia, positions itself against bloated grantmaking software: sophisticated but affordable, with no per-seat pricing and unlimited users, funding allocations, form fields, and file capacity on every plan. The vendor lists SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO/IEC 27001 certification, 40-plus professional translations, data residency options, and WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility compliance.
The review tooling is genuinely high-end: five review modes, multiple rounds, panel management, real-time results, and recusal plus abstention options. Pre-award, it handles planning, opportunity announcement, application management, and review; awarding covers agreement signing and funding management. Organizers running awards with a grantmaking flavor, scholarships, or prize funds will find it a natural fit at a lower price point than the enterprise leaders.
What we like- No per-user or seat pricing, with unlimited users, admins, and file capacity
- Strong multilingual and multi-currency support
- Five review modes with recusal options
Watch out for- Grantmaking focus means awards-specific ceremony features are thin
- Pricing not published
- Post-award evaluation tooling still in development
#8
YouNoodle
Best for: startup competitions, accelerators, and innovation challenges
Visit younoodle.com
Starting price$199/month
Free planNo
YouNoodle is the specialist for entrepreneurship competitions. Founded in 2010 in San Francisco, it has powered more than 400 international competitions across 100 countries for universities, governments, and corporations, including Stanford BASES, the Amazon Startup Challenge, and NASA. Its differentiator is unique in the category: a 400,000-plus entrepreneur network that actively connects your program to founders, so you get applicants, not just software.
The platform itself is a complete workflow from application to winner selection: branded program pages, custom forms with automated emails and smart reminders, automatic reviewer assignment with criteria-based scoring, and real-time dashboards. The vendor's FAQ states pricing starts at $199/month for the starter plan, scaling with program size. If applicant sourcing is your biggest headache, no competitor matches this model.
What we like- 400,000-plus entrepreneur network that actively supplies applicants
- 15-plus years serving competitions including NASA and Start-Up Chile
- Set-up in 1-5 business days
Watch out for- Pricing starts at $199/month with no free tier
- Applicant network is startup-specific
- Less suited to traditional grants or art awards
#9
SurveyMonkey Apply
Best for: universities and nonprofits that want polished application portals with automation
Visit apply.surveymonkey.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
SurveyMonkey Apply (from the SurveyMonkey/Momentive stable) is application management software for grants and programs, trusted by universities and nonprofits including Harvard, the British Science Association, and Girls Who Code. Its portals are the draw: branded, intuitive, and fast for applicants, with smart dynamic forms, skip logic, real-time collaboration on proposals, and automated workflows that track progress and simplify decisions.
Post-award activity is a strength: custom post-award stages with forms, document uploads, evaluations, and automated reminders keep grantees compliant. The vendor offers free implementation and onboarding with unlimited support, which matters for small teams. One documented customer saw completed scholarship applications increase 220% after switching. Pricing is quote-based, so expect a sales conversation.
What we like- Smart forms with 20-plus question types, skip logic, and file uploads
- Strong post-award stage management
- Free implementation and unlimited support
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing
- Grants and scholarships focus over pure awards
- Branding tied to the SurveyMonkey name whether you want it or not
Frequently asked questions
What does awards management software actually do?
It manages the full lifecycle of an awards or applications program: collecting entries or applications through branded forms, coordinating judging or review rounds with scoring, communicating with entrants and judges, and publishing results. Most platforms also handle entry fees, public voting, and reporting.
How much does awards management software cost?
Pricing models vary. Evalato publishes per-program pricing from €2,500, and YouNoodle starts at $199/month. Award Force, OpenWater, Submittable, Reviewr, Good Grants, Judgify, and SurveyMonkey Apply are quote-based, so expect to demo and discuss your entry volume, judging complexity, and timeline.
Can awards software handle public voting?
Most can. Evalato supports optional public voting with social login, Judgify includes public voting in its all-in-one flow, Award Force offers a people's choice option, and OpenWater handles voting management. If public voting is central to your program, verify how each platform prevents duplicate votes.
What is the difference between awards management and grants management software?
Awards software centers on entries, judging, scoring, and winners; grants software adds pre-award planning, post-award monitoring, payments, and compliance reporting. Platforms like Submittable, Good Grants, and SurveyMonkey Apply cover both, while Award Force and Judgify lean toward awards and competitions.
Do any platforms offer free plans?
Yes. Judgify is free for events with free tickets, and Evalato offers unlimited free testing without a credit card. YouNoodle and the quote-based enterprise platforms do not offer free tiers, though most provide demos or pilots.
How long does implementation take?
Simple programs can launch in days: YouNoodle cites 1-5 business days, and Evalato offers ready-made templates for same-day setup. Enterprise programs with integrations, multilingual needs, and complex judging rounds typically take weeks; Submittable advertises launches in as little as four weeks.
What to check before you commit
Start with entry volume and judging complexity, because they drive cost. Per-program pricing (Evalato, YouNoodle's tiers) rewards predictable volume, while quote-based platforms negotiate around entries, judges, and rounds. Model your peak: the largest single category, the busiest judging round, and the number of judges scoring simultaneously.
Second, test the judge experience, not just the admin dashboard. Judges are volunteers whose time is scarce; a confusing portal means delayed scores and biased results. Run a trial judging round with real entries and ask your judges how it felt.
Third, check data residency and compliance early if you accept entries across borders. Award Force, Good Grants, and Evalato all advertise region selection and GDPR compliance, but confirm your specific region before signing. Finally, confirm exit terms: ask for a sample data export format and what happens to your data when the contract ends.
Sources we checked (12)
- https://awardforce.com/
- https://getopenwater.com/
- https://submittable.com/
- https://evalato.com/
- https://reviewr.com/
- https://judgify.me/
- https://goodgrants.com/
- https://younoodle.com
- https://apply.surveymonkey.com/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouNoodle
- https://markets.financialcontent.com/ibtimes/article/prlog-2025-2-13-g2-names-openwater-a-winter-2025-leader-in-awards-and-scholarship-management
- https://slashdot.org/software/comparison/Award-Force-vs-Evalato/
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Request a listing
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has spent more than a decade helping SaaS and e-commerce brands grow through search. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.