How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- Jasper is the content team's tool, priced per seat at $59 a month on annual billing, with brand voice controls as its reason to exist.
- Copy.ai starts far cheaper at $29 a month for five seats, then jumps to $1,000 a month for its workflow tier.
- HubSpot puts AI inside the CRM marketers already use, with a free tier and AI features concentrated in paid plans.
- Anyword scores copy for predicted performance before you spend on distribution.
- Profound tracks how brands appear in AI answers, the newest job on this list, and prices it by quote.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 Jasper | On brand long form content at team scale | $59/month | No |
 Copy.ai | Go to market workflows and sales copy | $29/month | Yes |
 HubSpot | AI inside a CRM and campaign platform | Free | Yes |
 Writesonic | SEO content plus AI search tracking | $79/month | No |
 Anyword | Predictive scoring for ads and landing pages | See website | No |
 Surfer | Optimising articles against ranking pages | $79/month | No |
 Profound | Brand visibility inside AI answers | See website | No |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
#1Jasper
Best for: On brand long form content at team scale4.8/5 on
Capterra (1,855 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit jasper.ai
Starting price$59/month
Free planNo
Jasper is the reference point for marketing content teams. You train it on your style guide, product facts and published samples, and it drafts in that voice across blog posts, campaigns and ads. For a team publishing volume, the saving is not the drafting, it is the editing: output that starts near the house style needs less correction from every reviewer in the chain.
The economics need care. Pro is $59 per seat per month billed annually, $69 monthly, and every teammate is another seat. A three person team is looking at roughly $180 to $210 a month before the custom Business tier enters the conversation. If your writers each publish a lot, that can pay for itself. If AI writing is an occasional helper, a general chatbot subscription does the same drafts for less.
What we like- Brand Voice and knowledge assets keep output consistent across writers, Canvas workspace is built for campaign documents rather than one off prompts, marketing specific templates and agents cover ads, email and long form, 7 day trial instead of a free tier
Watch out for- Priced per seat, so a five person team pays five times the headline figure, Business tier is custom priced with a minimum term, writing only, with no media buying or analytics depth
#2Copy.ai
Best for: Go to market workflows and sales copy4.4/5 on
Capterra (67 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit copy.ai
Starting price$29/month
Free planYes
Copy.ai began as a copy generator and rebuilt itself as a go to market platform. The chat writes the short copy it always wrote, but the selling point now is workflows: routines that research a list of accounts, enrich them and draft personalised outreach, shared between marketing and sales. For a small team that lives in outbound, that blend is the appeal.
The pricing shape is the warning. Chat at $29 a month for five seats is cheap. The workflow plans that make Copy.ai different start around $1,000 a month, metered by credits. Budget for the tier you will actually use, because the gap between trying Copy.ai and running on it is one of the widest in this roundup.
What we like- Chat plan covers five seats for one low monthly price, workflows automate research and outreach routines across marketing and sales, free plan lets a team test the chat before paying, strong library of go to market playbooks to copy
Watch out for- The step from Chat to the workflow tiers is a jump to $1,000 a month, workflow credits meter the automation you actually want, takes longer to learn than a plain writing tool
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
HubSpot's answer to AI tooling is to put it where the customer data already lives. Its Breeze agents draft content, research prospects and clean records inside the CRM, and the surrounding Marketing Hub sends the campaigns those agents help build. For a team already on HubSpot, that integration is worth more than a smarter standalone writer.
The honest cost picture matters more than the free tier headline. Starter seats run about $20 a month, but the AI depth most teams picture sits in Professional, commonly around $890 a month for the first seats, plus credit packs for agent work. Price the tier with the features you saw in the demo, not the tier on the advert.
What we like- Breeze AI agents work on your real CRM data, not pasted exports, free tier covers small teams and basic marketing tools, email, landing pages, ads and reporting share one database, agents can draft content, summarise records and enrich contacts
Watch out for- The capable AI features concentrate in Professional plans around $890 a month, seat and contact tiers push the total up as you grow, AI credits for automated work sit on top of the subscription
#4Writesonic
Best for: SEO content plus AI search tracking4.7/5 on
G2 (2,133 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit writesonic.com
Starting price$79/month
Free planNo
Writesonic rebuilt itself around a shift marketers can feel: buyers now meet brands inside AI answers as often as in search results. Its writer produces SEO articles, and its tracking shows how a brand appears in AI Overviews and chatbot answers for the prompts that matter, with fixes suggested in the same product. That pairing of measurement and production is its pitch.
Plans start at $79 a month billed annually, with article volume the meter that matters. It will not replace a strategist, and its visibility sampling carries the same limits as every AI tracker: prompts are a sample, answers vary, and the trend matters more than any single day's score.
What we like- Article writer is tuned for search content with research built in, tracks brand visibility in AI answers alongside classic SEO, content optimisation tools connect drafts to ranking gaps, plans priced for individuals and small teams
Watch out for- Quality still needs a human editor on anything important, word and article limits shape the real monthly cost, AI visibility data is sampled, like every tracker in that category
#5Anyword
Best for: Predictive scoring for ads and landing pages4.8/5 on
G2 (1,228 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit anyword.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Anyword sells a different promise: not faster drafts, but a score. Paste ad or landing page variants and it predicts which will perform, using models trained on marketing results, then explains which phrases help or hurt for your audience. For a performance team testing twenty ad variants a week, ranking them before spend is real money saved.
Treat the score as a prior, not a verdict. It knows nothing about your offer, your landing page speed or your audience's mood this month, and its published pricing has shifted, which is why this entry says See website. Teams with steady ad volume get the value; a business writing one ad a month does not need a prediction engine.
What we like- Scores copy variants for predicted engagement before launch, trained on marketing performance data rather than general text, brand voice and audience controls keep variants on message, copy intelligence shows which past phrases performed
Watch out for- Predictions are probabilities, and small accounts give the model little to learn from, published entry pricing has moved between sources, so confirm on the pricing page, focused on short performance copy, not long form content
#6Surfer
Best for: Optimising articles against ranking pages4.6/5 on
G2 (126 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit surferseo.com
Starting price$79/month
Free planNo
Surfer is the optimisation layer. Its editor compares your draft with the pages ranking for the target keyword and scores coverage of terms, structure and length, so a marketer can see why a rival's article outranks theirs and close the gap. With AI drafting added inside the editor, the loop from brief to scored draft happens in one window.
Use the score as a checklist, not a target to max out. Pages written to please the meter read alike, and search engines have years of practice ignoring content built that way. Surfer at $79 a month earns its place when a team publishes search content weekly and wants every piece checked against the current results page before it ships.
What we like- Content editor grades drafts against the pages currently ranking, keyword research and topical mapping support planning, AI drafting sits inside the same editor as the scoring, works alongside the writer or AI tool you already use
Watch out for- Chasing the content score can flatten writing into sameness, no free plan, and audits consume plan credits, it optimises the page, not the strategy behind the calendar
#7Profound
Best for: Brand visibility inside AI answers4.6/5 on
G2 (640 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit tryprofound.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Profound measures the newest channel in marketing: what ChatGPT, Google AI answers and similar engines say about your brand when a buyer asks for a recommendation. It tracks mention rates, sentiment and the citations behind answers, which gives PR and content teams a work list of sources to earn coverage in.
Pricing is by quote and the product is aimed at companies for whom AI recommendations move real revenue. Smaller brands can sample the same questions manually in a chatbot for free, less systematically. Either way, read its numbers as sampled answers that change run to run, useful for direction and share against competitors, not as a fixed scoreboard.
What we like- Tracks how often and how favourably AI engines mention your brand, shows the sources AI answers cite, so you can target them, prompt level reporting suits brand and PR teams, built specifically for AI search rather than adapted from rank tracking
Watch out for- Quote based pricing aimed at brands and agencies with budget, AI answers are unstable, so daily figures swing without anything changing, measurement only, it does not create the coverage it reports missing
How we chose
Tools were picked to cover distinct marketing jobs rather than seven versions of the same writer: content production, go to market automation, CRM native AI, predictive scoring, SEO optimisation and AI search visibility. Prices were taken from vendor pricing pages and current comparisons in October 2026; where published figures conflicted between sources, the entry says See website. Every tool is a currently operating product with a marketing specific offer, and no tool here claims, or is claimed, to produce results without human editing and review.
Count seats, credits and minimum terms before the headline price. Jasper charges per seat, Copy.ai meters workflows with credits and jumps to four figures for them, and HubSpot's useful AI sits several tiers above its free plan. The price of the demo you watched is rarely the entry price on the advert, so rebuild the quote with your team size and the features you actually saw.
Test with your own material. Run your best performing page, email and ad through a trial and ask the people who will edit the output whether it saves them time. AI tools differ less in raw draft quality than in how well they hold a brand voice and product facts, and that only shows on real work, not sample prompts.
Finally, keep the measurement honest. Faster drafts are a cost saving you can count in hours. Claims about conversion and ranking gains need your own before and after data, because no vendor's case study was run on your audience, your offer or your market.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI tool for a small marketing team?
Copy.ai's Chat plan at $29 a month for five seats is the cheapest shared start, and HubSpot's free tier works if you want AI inside a CRM from day one. A solo marketer often does as well with a general AI subscription plus Surfer for the content they publish.
Do AI marketing tools replace copywriters?
No. They replace blank pages and first drafts. The tools here produce workable copy quickly, but accuracy, taste, product truth and legal claims still need a human who knows the business. Teams report the gain as more output per writer and faster testing, not the removal of writers.
How much do AI marketing tools cost in 2026?
Entry points run from free tiers to about $79 a month for focused tools, $59 per seat for Jasper, and four figures a month for workflow platforms and enterprise AI visibility. Budget for seats and credits, because both quietly multiply the advertised price.
Is AI generated marketing content safe for SEO?
Search engines judge content on usefulness, not on whether a person or a model typed it. Thin, repetitive AI content built to fill pages performs badly and can be treated as spam. Edited, accurate content that answers the reader's question performs the same as any other good page.
What does AI search visibility tracking actually measure?
Tools like Profound and Writesonic run sets of buyer questions through AI engines and record whether your brand is mentioned, how it is described and which sources the answer cites. It is sampled measurement: answers vary between runs, so the trend and your share against named competitors matter more than a single score.
Sources we checked (0)
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.