How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- Figma Make is the pick for design teams: AI app building inside Figma itself, bundled with a Professional Full seat at 16 dollars a month billed annually.
- Lovable and Bolt build working full stack prototypes, not just screens: free daily credits to start, and Pro plans at 25 dollars a month each.
- v0 is the developer's favourite for polished React interfaces, with a free tier of 5 dollars in monthly credits and Plus at 30 dollars per user a month.
- Treat every AI prototype as a draft with confidence: layouts break, flows go missing, and generated code needs review before anything becomes a product.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 Figma Make | Figma native prototyping | $16 per month | No |
 Lovable | Full stack app prototypes | Free | Yes |
 Bolt | In browser rapid builds | Free | Yes |
 v0 | React UI generation | Free | Yes |
 Google Stitch | Free UI design exploration | Free | No |
 Uizard | Sketch and text to wireframes | $12 per month | Yes |
 Relume | Sitemaps and site prototypes | $18 per month | Yes |
 Framer | Prototypes that become sites | $10 per month | Yes |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Starting price$16 per month
Free planNo
What we like- Figma Make builds functional apps from prompts and Figma frames without leaving the file your team already designs in, and results can be copied back as editable layers, which keeps design and prototype in one conversation. It is bundled with Figma paid plans: a Professional Full seat at 16 dollars per editor a month billed annually includes Make with a monthly AI credit allowance, currently listed around 3,000 credits on Professional. For design led teams, the zero context switch is the whole argument.
Watch out for- Make requires a paid Full seat
- Starter users get only limited trial credits in drafts, so there is no real free tier. Generated code is a prototyping output, not a production handoff, and engineering teams should expect to rebuild or heavily review it. Credit allowances are shared across Figma's AI features, so heavy AI use elsewhere in Figma eats the same budget.
#2Lovable
Best for: Full stack app prototypes4.6/5 on
G2 (456 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit lovable.dev
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
What we like- Lovable generates complete applications from a description: React front end, Supabase backed database, authentication, and storage, deployed to a live URL, so a founder can put a working product in front of users this week. The free tier gives five build credits a day up to 30 a month for public projects, and Pro at 25 dollars a month, 21 billed annually, brings 100 credits, private projects, and code download, with two way GitHub sync. Its visual editor and pre build direction choices make it the most approachable full stack builder here.
Watch out for- Credit burn is roughly half to two credits per edit, so a long refinement session consumes a month of Pro quickly, and its Business tier famously doubles the price for the same credits, buying governance rather than capacity. Architecture control is limited
- Complex custom logic needs developer cleanup in the exported code. AI generated back ends must be security reviewed before real user data touches them.
#3Bolt
Best for: In browser rapid builds4.3/5 on
G2 (94 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit bolt.new
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
What we like- Bolt, from StackBlitz, runs a real development environment in the browser: prompt an app into existence, watch it build and run, edit, and deploy, with support for multiple frameworks and even native mobile through Expo. Its free tier includes one million tokens a month, and Pro at 25 dollars a month, 18 billed annually, raises that to ten million with custom domains. Plan mode and enhanced prompts help steer bigger builds, and Figma frames can be imported as a starting point.
Watch out for- Token consumption scales with project size and iteration count, so ambitious prototypes can burn a monthly allowance surprisingly fast. Reviewers report context degradation in very long sessions, where the model loses track of earlier decisions. As with Lovable, the output is a fast draft: production use demands code review, testing, and security work the demo skips.
#4v0
Best for: React UI generation4.5/5 on
G2 (28 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit v0.app
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
What we like- V0, from Vercel, is the interface specialist: describe or import a design and it produces polished React and Next.js components in the shadcn and Tailwind style, with a design mode for visual edits and direct deployment to Vercel. The free tier includes about 5 dollars in monthly credits and a daily message allowance, and Plus at 30 dollars per user a month is the current entry paid plan for individuals. Developers rate its output quality and code cleanliness at the top of this list.
Watch out for- It builds front ends only: no database, authentication, or backend, which you integrate yourself or pair with another service. Credit burn depends on the model you select, so flagship models make iteration expensive. Hosting on Vercel is billed separately beyond its free hobby tier, a second line item to budget.
Starting priceFree
Free planNo
What we like- Stitch is Google's free experiment in AI UI design: describe an app or site and it generates screens and flows you can paste into Figma as editable designs or export as front end code, at no cost within its daily Labs limits. For exploration, three layout directions before lunch, nothing else here is free at this quality. It is a genuinely useful front end to the design process even for teams who finish work elsewhere.
Watch out for- Free here means a Labs product: limits apply, terms can change, and there is no paid tier to buy certainty with, which is why the free plan column reads no despite zero cost. Output fidelity for complex flows still needs a designer's hand. It designs interfaces rather than building working back ends, so it pairs with, rather than replaces, the code first tools.
#6Uizard
Best for: Sketch and text to wireframes4.5/5 on
G2 (46 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit uizard.io
Starting price$12 per month
Free planYes
What we like- Uizard, now part of Miro, is the non designer's prototyping tool: turn a text prompt, a screenshot, or a hand drawn sketch photograph into editable wireframes and mockups, with templates for apps and sites and handoff friendly exports. The free tier covers two projects with a few AI generations a month, and Pro at 12 dollars a month billed annually opens the full generator. Product managers use it to make ideas discussable before a designer touches them.
Watch out for- Its outputs are wireframe to mid fidelity: final visual design still happens in a real design tool. AI generations on the free tier run out in a single enthusiastic afternoon. Inside Miro's ownership, packaging and plan details have been shifting, so confirm the current tier contents before an annual commitment.
#7Relume
Best for: Sitemaps and site prototypes3.3/5 on
G2 (8 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit relume.io
Starting price$18 per month
Free planYes
What we like- Relume starts a website where websites should start: describe the business and it generates a sitemap and wireframes built from its large component library, exportable to Figma, Webflow, or React, so a marketing site prototype arrives structured rather than as disconnected screens. A free tier covers a small project, and Starter runs from 18 dollars a month. Agencies use it to cut days from site kickoffs and align clients on structure before visuals.
Watch out for- It is a website tool: app interfaces and product flows are outside its centre of gravity. The component driven look can feel generic until a designer layers brand and custom sections over it. Full export destinations and project counts sit in the paid tiers, so the free plan is an evaluation, not a workflow.
#8Framer
Best for: Prototypes that become sites4.5/5 on
G2 (144 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit framer.com
Starting price$10 per month
Free planYes
What we like- Framer turns prompts and its AI tools into real, publishable websites on its own hosting: the prototype is the site, with a visual editor, CMS, and animation tools for the polish pass. Plans with AI access start from about 10 dollars a month on yearly billing, with a monthly AI credit allowance. For landing pages and marketing sites, it collapses prototype and launch into one step that clients can see live.
Watch out for- It is a website builder, not an app platform: product interfaces with real data and logic belong to Lovable, Bolt, or v0. AI generation is a starting accelerator inside Framer, not its whole value, and serious sites still need design hours. Site plan pricing layers on top of the AI story, so read the full bill for a multi site team.
How we chose
We compared the AI prototyping tools that September and October 2026 comparisons from UXMagic, ForaSoft, Taskade, Mowgli, and dev.to rank most consistently, and verified credit systems and entry prices against their pricing surveys. We balanced design first, code first, and site building tools deliberately, because the category word prototyping covers all three in current usage. We required an AI generation core, which excludes classic click through tools without generation, and we stated free tier units in each vendor's own terms, since credits, tokens, and messages are not interchangeable.
Decide the deliverable first, in one sentence. If stakeholders must react to a design, generate in Figma Make, Stitch, or Uizard and keep the work in the design system. If they must react to a working product, with signup, data, and a real flow, Lovable or Bolt gets you there this week and v0 builds the interface layer to a higher polish. If the prototype is a marketing site, Relume for structure or Framer for a publishable result shortens the path most. Choosing the wrong kind costs more than choosing the second best tool of the right kind.
Budget the iteration, not the generation. The first prompt is nearly free everywhere; the fiftieth refinement is where credits go, so trial on your real project and count the burn rate per finished screen before subscribing. Keep three accuracy disciplines from day one: replace all placeholder data with realistic content before showing stakeholders, because invented numbers anchor decisions; click every flow to its end, including errors and empty states, which generators routinely skip; and treat exported code as unreviewed draft, subject to the same security, accessibility, and licence review as any new codebase. An AI prototype's job is to make the next decision cheaper, and it does that job best when nobody in the room mistakes it for the product.
Frequently asked questions
Can AI prototyping tools replace designers and developers?
No. They replace blank pages. The tools here generate strong first drafts of screens, flows, and even working apps, but product judgement, edge cases, accessibility, security, and maintainable code remain human work. Teams use them to explore more directions and reach user testing sooner, not to skip the disciplines that make software trustworthy.
How much do AI prototyping tools cost in practice?
Entry paid plans run 10 to 30 dollars a month: Framer from about 10, Uizard 12, Figma Make inside a 16 dollar Figma seat, Relume from 18, Lovable and Bolt at 25, and v0 Plus at 30 per user. The real variable is credit or token burn during iteration, so your monthly cost depends on how much refining your project needs.
Which tool is best for a non technical founder?
Lovable for a working app with accounts and data, because it handles the back end and deployment in plain language. Uizard or Stitch if you only need screens to show a designer or investor. Start on the free daily credits and describe your idea in terms of user flows, not features, for the best first generation.
Is the code these tools generate safe to ship?
Treat it as a draft from a fast junior developer: often clean looking, sometimes wrong, and not security reviewed. Generated authentication, payments, and data handling need professional review before real users or real data are involved. Many teams ship marketing surfaces from these tools and rebuild transactional systems properly.
Why do free tiers feel so small?
Generation runs on expensive models, so free allowances, five credits a day at Lovable, a million tokens at Bolt, a few dollars of credit at v0, are priced as evaluation budgets. They are enough to learn a tool's quality on your own idea, which is their purpose; sustained building is the paid product.
Sources we checked (0)
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.