How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Rankite is independent; if a vendor ever pays for a featured spot, that listing is clearly labeled Partner.
Key takeaways
- Spark Hire is the safest mainstream pick for SMB teams that want both one-way and live interviews, at $249/month billed annually.
- Willo and Hireflix are the best value for occasional or smaller-scale async screening, starting at $59 per live role and $75/month respectively.
- HireVue and VidCruiter are enterprise-grade options with custom pricing, built for high-volume or compliance-heavy hiring.
- myInterview is now folded into Radancy with no published standalone pricing, so ask for a quote before assuming anything.
- Interview count caps and missing live-interview support are the two gotchas to check on every plan before you buy.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 HireVue | high-volume enterprise screening | See website | No |
 Spark Hire | SMBs that want one-way and live interviews | $249/month (billed annually) | No |
 VidCruiter | compliance-heavy structured hiring | See website | No |
 Willo | occasional async screening by role | $59/live role/month | Free trial (14 days) |
 Hireflix | simple one-way interviews for small teams | $75/month (billed annually) | Free trial (30 days) |
 Hirevire | multi-format async screening on a budget | $39/month (billed annually) | Free trial |
 Jobma | teams that need live and one-way in one tool | See website | No |
 myInterview | AI-assisted screening inside the Radancy platform | See website | No |
 interviewstream | flexible enterprise video interviewing | See website | No |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
The best video interview software
Most video interview software is sold as a time saver, and honestly, that is underselling it. The real value is not the hours you save on phone screens. It is the interviews you never have to schedule at all because candidates answered your questions on their own time and you watched the answers at 1.5x speed with coffee.
The catch is that these tools split into two very different camps. Budget one-way tools charge under $150 a month and do async screening beautifully. Enterprise platforms start around $35,000 a year and add assessments, AI scoring, and compliance tooling you may or may not need. Buying the enterprise version of a screening tool when you hire 20 people a year is like renting a bus for your daily commute.
So this list is organized around fit, not features. If you hire a handful of people a month, start with Willo, Hireflix, or Hirevire. If your recruiting team screens thousands of applicants, look at HireVue, VidCruiter, or Spark Hire. We checked pricing on each vendor's own site and marked the ones that keep prices behind a sales call.
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
HireVue is the tool other video interview platforms get compared against. It combines one-way video interviews with live interviews, game-based assessments, virtual job tryouts, and AI-driven candidate scoring, all built on assessment science from industrial-organizational psychologists. For a Fortune 500 hiring thousands of similar roles, that depth matters.
The price is the honest filter. HireVue publishes no pricing; contracts are custom-quoted, and third-party procurement data puts the entry tier around $35,000 a year with implementation fees on top. You will go through a sales process and likely sign a multi-year commitment. If your volume justifies it, the structured, auditable screening workflow is genuinely strong. If it does not, one of the tools below does 80% of the job for 5% of the price.
What we like- One-way and live interviews in one platform
- AI and game-based assessments from industrial-organizational psychology
- Deep ATS integrations for big teams
Watch out for- No public pricing and multi-year contracts
- Implementation takes months, not days
- Overkill for teams hiring fewer than a few hundred people a year
Starting price$249/month (billed annually)
Free planNo
Spark Hire is the default recommendation for small and mid-size teams, and there is a reason it shows up in almost every comparison. The video interview plans start at $299 a month monthly or $249 a month billed annually, and that covers unlimited one-way and live interviews, branding, interview scheduling, and 24/7 support. It is simple to set up and your candidates do not need much handholding.
Watch the caps on the entry plan: five active jobs and five users. That is plenty for a small hiring team, but if several hiring managers recruit at once, you will bump into the ceiling and need to talk to sales. There is also no free trial, which is unfortunate at this price. Still, for structured async screening with a real evaluation workflow, this is the most complete package under $300 a month.
What we like- Both one-way and live video interviews in one subscription
- Scorecards, ratings, and comments built in
- Connects with 30+ ATS platforms
Watch out for- No free plan or free trial
- Per-job and per-user caps on the entry plan
- The full ATS is a separate product with separate pricing
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
VidCruiter positions itself as a full interview lifecycle platform rather than just a video tool. You get pre-recorded and live video interviews plus structured interview guides, automated scheduling with reminders, panel coordination, and standardized scorecards that keep every candidate evaluated the same way. That consistency is the whole point for regulated industries.
The tradeoff is complexity and cost. Pricing is quote-based and usage-driven, and several review sources note that getting the workflows right requires collaboration with the vendor. If you need auditable, defensible hiring processes, this is a feature, not a bug. If you just want to watch candidates answer five questions asynchronously, it is more machine than you need.
What we like- Structured interview guides with standardized rating forms
- Strong scheduling automation and panel coordination
- Trusted in government, healthcare, and financial services
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing with no published tiers
- Heavier implementation than async-first tools
- AI features arrived later than competitors
Starting price$59/live role/month
Free planFree trial (14 days)
Willo took an unusual pricing approach and it works well for teams that hire in waves. The Lite plan is $59 per live role per month, pay as you go, with up to 5 live roles and 5 users. Hiring three people this quarter and nobody next quarter? You only pay for those three roles. The Enterprise tier starts at $3,799 a year for always-on hiring.
Feature-wise, Willo is deliberately human-centered: it gives reviewers evidence like transcripts and AI summaries rather than fully automated scores. A 14-day free trial lets you run a real screening round before paying. Just know that live interviews happen outside the platform through Zoom or Google Calendar sync, and if you want custom scorecards, branding, and the API, you are looking at Enterprise.
What we like- Pay-as-you-go per live role, no annual contract on Lite
- AI summaries and follow-up questions included
- Supports 18+ languages for global hiring
Watch out for- No live interview mode inside the platform
- Formal scorecards only on Enterprise
- Transcription and API access are Enterprise-only
Starting price$75/month (billed annually)
Free planFree trial (30 days)
Hireflix does one thing and keeps it simple. The Small plan at $75 a month billed annually (for companies under 50 employees) includes everything: unlimited user seats, unlimited positions, unlimited responses, video questions, custom domains, and ATS integrations with Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, and Workable. The pricing model is refreshingly flat: you pay for your company size, not per seat or per interview.
The minimalism is the product. Candidates click a link, record answers in any browser, done. There is no live interview mode, no AI candidate scoring, and the evaluation tools are comments and star ratings rather than weighted scorecards. For straightforward async screening, that is plenty. A 30-day free trial on all plans gives you a full month to test it with real roles.
What we like- All features on every plan, priced by company size
- Unlimited users, positions, and responses
- Candidates need no login, app, or registration
Watch out for- One-way interviews only, no live option
- Limited advanced analytics and no AI scoring depth
- Monthly interview expectations assume normal hiring volumes
Starting price$39/month (billed annually)
Free planFree trial
Hirevire is the budget disruptor in this space. At $39 a month billed annually, Essentials gives you 300 interviews a year, 1 active job, unlimited questions per interview, and AI transcripts. Candidates answer with video, audio, text, or file uploads, and they never have to create an account, which lifts completion rates.
The numbers to respect are the annual interview caps: 300 on Essentials, 1,200 on Professional ($99/month billed annually), and 12,000 on Agency ($199/month). For a small team that screens a few dozen candidates per role, those caps rarely bite. If they do, the Professional plan is still cheaper than most competitors' entry tiers. This is the best pick when money is tight but you want a polished candidate experience.
What we like- Cheapest credible entry point at $39/month
- Video, audio, text, and file responses in one link
- AI transcripts in 90+ languages
Watch out for- Interview caps per year on each plan (300 on Essentials)
- Advanced AI analytics reserved for higher tiers
- Screening-focused, not a full hiring suite
#7
Jobma
Best for: teams that need live and one-way in one tool
Visit jobma.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Jobma bundles more formats than most tools on this list: pre-recorded one-way interviews, live interviews, assessments, AI scoring, and candidate tracking in a single platform. It is SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified, which matters if your security team reviews every vendor, and it integrates with the major ATS platforms.
The friction is pricing. Jobma's pricing page currently offers only custom packages based on volume, integrations, and features, so you cannot self-serve or even benchmark before a sales conversation. Third-party sources cite older entry plans, but those are stale. If you want one vendor for every interview format and have the volume to justify a quote-based relationship, it is worth the demo. If you want to start today, pick something else.
What we like- One-way, live, and AI autonomous interviews together
- Built-in assessments and AI scoring
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified with ATS integrations
Watch out for- Custom quote-only pricing, no published plans
- Implementation timeline varies with configuration
- Geared toward mid-market and up
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
A quick update matters here: myInterview was acquired by Radancy, and the standalone self-serve product is essentially gone. The old site redirects into Radancy's screening and scheduling pages, and there is no published pricing or plan list anymore. Old figures like $29 a month still circulate on aggregator sites, but those predate the acquisition.
What remains is a capable AI screening engine inside a larger enterprise platform: predictive shortlisting, automated candidate ranking, and a mobile-friendly async interview flow. If you are already evaluating Radancy, myInterview's screening module is a genuine asset. If you were hoping to sign up for the old myInterview plans, adjust your expectations and budget for an enterprise quote.
What we like- AI-powered shortlisting and automated candidate ranking
- Mobile-first candidate experience
- Backed by Radancy's enterprise recruiting suite
Watch out for- Acquired by Radancy, so the standalone product and pricing are gone
- No public pricing or self-serve plans
- Product direction may keep shifting
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
interviewstream has been in video interviewing since the early days, and the platform reflects that maturity: on-demand interviews, live interview connectivity, scheduling tools, SSO, and analytics. It serves HR teams across technology, education, and healthcare, and the interface is consistently praised for being easy on candidates.
Pricing is quote-based across monthly, annual, and enterprise plans, so you will need a conversation to get numbers. Third-party estimates put the range around $100 to $500 a month, but treat that as a rough guess, not a quote. interviewstream fits teams that want a veteran vendor with flexible deployment (cloud and on-premise) and do not mind the sales-led buying process that comes with it.
What we like- On-demand, live, and scheduling tools in one suite
- 20+ years in the video interview space
- SOC 2 Type 2 certified
Watch out for- Quote-based pricing with no published tiers
- Limited third-party review volume compared to rivals
- Customization depth varies by plan
How we put this list together
We started from the vendors' own websites: their pricing pages, feature lists, and documentation, checking what is current in 2026 rather than relying on old aggregator snapshots. That mattered for tools like myInterview, where the Radancy acquisition changed everything, and Jobma, which moved to custom quotes. We cross-checked plan details, free trials, and limits against public reviews on G2, Capterra, and Software Advice, plus recruiter discussions on Reddit, to catch the gotchas vendors do not advertise, like interview caps and missing live modes. We weighted pricing transparency, candidate experience, interview format coverage, and fit for small-to-mid-size teams, since that is who this list is for. We did not run hands-on trials, so treat this as a research-based shortlist to take into demos, not a lab verdict.
What to check before you buy
Start with format coverage. Some tools do one-way interviews only (Hireflix, Willo), some do both one-way and live (Spark Hire, HireVue, Jobma), and a few bundle assessments and scheduling too. If your team still runs live interviews over Zoom, a one-way-only tool is fine. If you want one platform for everything, narrow the field first.
Then check the caps that actually constrain you. Entry plans limit active jobs, user seats, interviews per year, or responses per month. Map those to your real hiring volume: a team filling 30 roles a year with 40 candidates each will blow through a 300-interview annual cap by spring. Unlimited-response plans like Hireflix's cost more per month but remove the mental math entirely.
Pricing model is the third filter. Per-seat plans (Spark Hire's job and user caps), per-role plans (Willo Lite), per-company-size plans (Hireflix), and custom enterprise quotes (HireVue, VidCruiter, Jobma, interviewstream) make direct comparison tricky. Calculate your cost at 12 months of your actual hiring pattern, not the headline number.
Trial and onboarding realities
Most of these tools advertise fast setup, and for the self-serve ones it is true: you can create questions and send your first interview link the same day. Enterprise platforms quote weeks to months of implementation, so if you need screening running by next Monday, that is a disqualifier. Free trials exist on Willo (14 days), Hireflix (30 days), and Hirevire, which is enough to run one real role through. Spark Hire, HireVue, VidCruiter, and Jobma require a demo or sales call, so budget that time.
Compliance and candidate experience
If you hire in regulated industries or government, ask about SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and EEOC-friendly structured workflows before you fall in love with a feature set. Jobma, VidCruiter, and HireVue lead here. For candidate experience, the details matter: no-login links (Hireflix, Hirevire) complete better than platforms requiring candidate accounts, mobile-friendly recording matters for hourly and retail roles, and retake settings keep the process fair. Ask every vendor how candidate videos are stored, how long they are retained, and how you export or delete them.
One more thing about AI scoring
AI interview scoring is the most divisive feature in this category. HireVue, myInterview (via Radancy), and Jobma offer AI-driven candidate ranking and automated shortlisting. Supporters say it standardizes screening at volume; critics point to bias concerns and candidates gaming recorded answers. Our take: use AI for transcripts, summaries, and surfacing highlights, and keep the actual shortlist decision human until you have validated the model on your own hiring data. If a vendor cannot explain what their scoring model evaluates and how it was validated, that is a red flag.
Frequently asked questions
Do video interview tools work for hourly and high-volume hiring?
Yes, and that is where they save the most time. One-way interviews let hundreds of candidates record answers on their own schedule, which beats phone-tagging every applicant for a retail or warehouse role. Look for mobile-friendly recording, no-login links, and bulk invitations if you hire hourly workers at scale.
What is the difference between one-way and live video interviews?
One-way (async) interviews have candidates record answers to preset questions whenever they want, with no interviewer present. Live interviews are scheduled two-way video calls, similar to Zoom. Some tools do both, some only do one-way, so confirm which formats a plan includes before you commit.
How much does video interview software cost?
Budget async tools run $39 to $150 a month for small teams. Mid-range platforms like Spark Hire sit around $250 to $300 a month. Enterprise tools like HireVue start near $35,000 a year with custom quotes. Your hiring volume and whether you need assessments or compliance features drive most of the difference.
Do candidates actually complete video interviews?
Completion rates vary with friction. Tools with no-login links, mobile support, and short time limits (15 to 20 minutes total) report the best completion. Requiring candidate accounts, like HireVue does, can cause 20 to 25% drop-off, so weigh that against the platform's other strengths.
Can these tools replace our ATS?
Most cannot, and most are not trying to. Spark Hire, VidCruiter, and Jobma have some ATS-like features, but dedicated screening tools like Hireflix and Hirevire expect you to keep your ATS. Check the native integrations before buying, because a tool that does not sync with your ATS creates manual work.
Are AI-scored interviews legal?
The legal picture is evolving, with several US states and jurisdictions adding rules around automated employment decision tools. Vendors like HireVue publish adverse-impact testing and compliance documentation; ask any vendor for theirs. When in doubt, use AI for transcription and summaries rather than automated rejection, and have counsel review your process.
Sources we checked (11)
- https://www.sparkhire.com/pricing
- https://www.willo.video/pricing
- https://hireflix.com/pricing
- https://www.hirevue.com
- https://www.vidcruiter.com
- https://hirevire.com
- https://www.jobma.com/pricing
- https://www.myinterview.com
- https://www.interviewstream.com
- https://www.capterra.com/p/125710/Spark-Hire/pricing/
- https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/vidcruiter-profile/
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has spent more than a decade helping SaaS and e-commerce brands grow through search. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.