How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- Amex GBT is the largest TMC by reported sales, over $34 billion in the BTN Top 25 for FY2024, and now includes Egencia and, since September 2025, CWT.
- BCD Travel is the other enterprise default, operating in about 109 countries on transaction and management fees.
- Navan offers travel free to companies up to 300 employees, funded by supplier commissions, with expenses at $15 per user per month; Perk publishes platform tiers from free plus booking percentages.
- Traditional TMC fees benchmark at roughly $18 to $42 per online booking and $38 to $95 per agent assisted booking per GBTA research, with total programme cost typically 2 to 5 percent of travel spend.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 Amex GBT | The largest global programmes | See website | No |
 BCD Travel | Global enterprise, complex itineraries | See website | No |
 Navan | Tech first travel and expense in one | Free | Yes |
 Perk | Small and mid size, Europe strong | Free | Yes |
 FCM Travel | Global coverage with a service culture | See website | No |
 CTM | Multinational programmes, Australasia roots | See website | No |
 SAP Concur | Expense led programmes already on SAP | See website | No |
 Direct Travel | US mid market managed programmes | See website | No |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
The best travel management companies in 2026
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Amex GBT is the gravity well of corporate travel. For a multinational running tens of millions in annual travel, its content deals, global footprint in 140 plus countries and traveller support network are the safe pair of hands the procurement file asks for, and its 2025 results, roughly $2.7 billion of revenue for the enlarged group, show the machine's size.
The CWT deal closed a strange chapter: announced, challenged by the DOJ in January 2025, then completed on 2 September 2025 after the department dismissed its own litigation. If your programme was CWT, your counterparty is now this entry, and the practical questions belong in your next quarterly review.
What we like- The industry's scale leader by reported sales, over $34 billion in the BTN Corporate Travel Top 25 for FY2024, publicly traded and the default shortlist name for global enterprise RFPs, owns both ends of the market: the full service GBT operation and Egencia, the digital platform it acquired in 2021, absorbed CWT in September 2025, adding its enterprise book and meetings business after the DOJ dismissed its antitrust case, negotiated content and duty of care infrastructure that smaller rivals lease rather than own
Watch out for- Priced by contract: transaction fees, management fees and professional services lines that only an RFP reveals, scale brings process: mid market buyers can feel like small fish in a very large pond, the CWT integration means some clients and teams are mid migration, with the service variability transitions bring
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
BCD is what the enterprise market looks like when it chooses continuity. Family owned through the BCD Group, it has grown by consistency rather than acquisition theatre, and its buyers tend to be long tenured. For complex itineraries, multi region programmes and travellers who genuinely phone humans, it remains a first division choice.
Put it in every enterprise RFP as the control sample: if a challenger cannot beat BCD on service design and total cost, the challenger has not earned the switch. Its fees will land inside the GBTA ranges the guide quotes, and the negotiation is about the management layer on top.
What we like- The other enterprise default: privately held, operating in about 109 countries, and shortlisted in nearly every large global RFP alongside Amex GBT, a reputation for service consistency and traveller care across regions, transaction and management fee model with established programme management and reporting, stability of ownership and strategy in a consolidating industry is itself a feature for risk averse buyers
Watch out for- Quote only pricing, like every traditional giant here, a comparatively lower profile on self serve technology, where the platform generation sets the pace, enterprise focus means smaller programmes may not see its best account attention
#3Navan
Best for: Tech first travel and expense in one4.7/5 on
G2 (9,297 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit navan.com
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
Navan, formerly TripActions, is the platform generation's leader and its pricing is the disruption in one line: give the travel product away to the mid market, earn from suppliers, charge for expense. For a 150 person company the arithmetic is close to unbeatable, and the product's polish explains why its users defend it.
Above 300 employees the conversation becomes an enterprise negotiation like everyone else's, judged on content, service and duty of care against BCD and Amex GBT. Evaluate the traveller experience honestly in a pilot: adoption is the metric on which TMC programmes quietly live or die, and Navan's design wins pilots.
What we like- Travel is free for companies up to 300 employees, funded by supplier commissions, an unusual and genuinely published model, travel and expense in one product, with expense at $15 per user per month and cards attached, so the reimbursement era ends, a traveller app employees rate highly, which is the real driver of programme adoption and policy compliance, fast self serve rollout measured in weeks where traditional implementations measure in quarters
Watch out for- Larger companies move to custom enterprise pricing that is not publicly calculable, so the free story has a size ceiling, some travellers report finding lower fares direct with suppliers on occasion, the standing platform era complaint, a younger company than the giants, with a shorter record through travel's crisis moments
Starting priceFree
Free planYes
Perk is the SMB and scale up face of the new model: sign up, set policy, book, with fees a finance lead can read off a public page. Its European roots are a real asset for companies whose travel is London, Berlin and Barcelona rather than Dallas and Denver, and its published tiers make it the easiest budget case to build in this list.
Do the percentage maths before the wedding. A programme of frequent cheap short haul trips pays little under either model; a programme of expensive long haul trips can pay more at 3 percent than a per transaction fee, which is precisely why Perk also sells negotiated enterprise terms to bigger buyers.
What we like- The former TravelPerk, rebranded Perk, publishes the most open pricing among the platform players: a free Starter tier plus a percentage per booking, Premium at $99 a month plus 3 percent, Pro at $299 plus 3 percent per its own comparison pages, strong European inventory and rail content, where US centric rivals are thinner, flexibility products for cancellable fares and a group events arm, quick onboarding for small teams that cannot staff an RFP
Watch out for- Percentage booking fees reward scrutiny on high fare programmes, where 3 percent of long haul premium tickets adds up, enterprise depth, complex global programme management, still trails the giants it cheerfully criticises, pricing pages and tiers were revised more than once recently, so confirm the current structure at signing
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
FCM sells the relationship model: an account team and consultants who know your travellers, wrapped around a booking platform that has modernised steadily. For companies burned by either extreme, the faceless platform or the fax era agency, FCM's middle position is the pitch, and its global shortlist record says the pitch lands.
As an Australian listed group's flagship, it also offers genuine geographic counterweight for Asia Pacific heavy programmes. Fees follow the traditional model, so the GBTA benchmarks in the guide are your negotiating frame.
What we like- The corporate arm of Flight Centre Travel Group, with a genuine global network and a brand built on named consultants rather than call centres, consistently shortlisted for multinational programmes in 2026 comparisons beside Amex GBT, BCD and CTM, its own platform plus agent service hybrid suits companies mid transition from unmanaged to managed travel, leisure group heritage gives it unusual depth in complex and group itineraries
Watch out for- Quote only, transaction and management fee pricing, platform polish varies by region more than the single brand suggests, less present in US domestic mid market mindshare than its global size warrants
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
CTM is the list's reminder that global travel management is not a two company industry. Its mixture of owned technology and agency service, and its institutional client base, make it a credible third bid in multinational RFPs, which is exactly the role that keeps the top two honest on price.
Consider it seriously when your travel map weights the Pacific or government style reporting and approval discipline. Like FCM, it will not publish a number for this article to quote, so its entry competes on record and footprint, and the RFP decides.
What we like- Corporate Travel Management, an Australian listed TMC with substantial North American and European operations built through acquisition, shortlisted for multinational programmes across 2026 comparisons, proprietary technology, including its Lightning booking tool, is a stated differentiator it owns rather than licences, strong government and institutional travel record in its home markets
Watch out for- Quote only pricing on the traditional model, a lower profile with US small and mid market buyers than its enterprise record deserves, an acquisition built footprint means regional service experiences can differ
#7SAP Concur
Best for: Expense led programmes already on SAP4.0/5 on
G2 (7,226 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit concur.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Concur is less a TMC than the rails much of corporate travel runs on: many companies pair Concur's booking and expense platform with a TMC from this list for service. That hybrid is its natural entry here, the choice when expense control and finance integration outrank traveller delight in the buying criteria.
Price it in two parts or be misled: the per report expense numbers are public and modest; the travel programme, platform tier plus fulfilment fees, is a contract. Companies that budgeted only the first part have a name for the experience, and it is not repeat purchase enthusiasm.
What we like- The incumbent platform in enterprise travel and expense, with the deepest finance system integrations in the business, published expense pricing gives a foothold: around $7 per report on Base and $11 on Plus in August 2026 procurement research, before the custom tier that includes full Concur Travel, if your company already runs SAP, the data and policy arguments for Concur are close to decisive, an enormous partner and TMC fulfilment ecosystem works through it
Watch out for- Concur Travel itself sits in the custom priced Premium tier, so the published figures are expense figures, not a travel programme price, traveller experience reviews trail the platform generation consistently, which feeds off programme booking and leakage, implementation and administration are real internal costs the licence does not show
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Direct Travel closes the list in the slot where many real programmes actually live: a few million in annual travel, mostly domestic, needing policy, duty of care and a human on the phone without an enterprise contract's overhead. Its repeated presence in current comparisons reflects that steady demand.
For that buyer the shortlist writes itself: Navan or Perk for the platform route, Direct Travel for the serviced route. Compare the account attention each bid actually staffs, which is where mid market programmes are won.
What we like- A long established US TMC aimed at the mid market the giants underserve, appearing on 2026 shortlists for hybrid programmes combining platform tools with agent service, owned technology and a service model pitched at companies too large for unmanaged booking and too small for Amex GBT's best attention, US and Canadian depth suits domestic heavy programmes
Watch out for- Quote only pricing on transaction and management terms, a smaller global network than the five names above it, partner arrangements fill the map, less public information overall, which puts more weight on references during selection
How we chose
We required an established record in current corporate travel comparisons and RFP shortlists, global or clearly defined regional coverage, and a programme offer, policy, duty of care and reporting, rather than a booking tool alone. Consolidation was applied as the sources report it: CWT inside Amex GBT from September 2025, Egencia inside Amex GBT since 2021, TravelPerk trading as Perk. Fee figures are GBTA benchmark ranges, not vendor quotes, and every contract priced company says See website because that is the truth of its model. We did not invent ratings or rankings.
What a TMC actually costs, in numbers you can use
Traditional programmes charge per transaction plus management: GBTA's 2025 procurement research puts loaded fees at roughly $18 to $42 for an online booking and $38 to $95 for an agent assisted one, with management fees of about $1.50 to $7 per trip on top. A 10,000 trip programme therefore runs in the region of $220,000 to $470,000 a year in TMC fees before meetings and events, and total programme management cost typically lands between 2 and 5 percent of travel spend.
Measure a bid against your real mix. A programme that is 90 percent simple online domestic trips should sit near the bottom of those ranges and should interrogate any quote that does not. Agent assisted share is the lever: every complex itinerary pushed to a good online tool saves the difference between the two fee bands, which is why the platform generation's design quality is a finance argument, not a taste argument.
Finally, negotiate the invisible lines: implementation, reporting customisation, traveller support hours, and what happens to your data and negotiated rates if you leave. In a market that just consolidated its top three into a top two, exit terms signed today are the strength you will wish you had at renewal.
Frequently asked questions
What does a travel management company do?
It manages a company's travel programme end to end: booking tools and agents, negotiated rates, policy enforcement, traveller tracking and duty of care, spend reporting and support during disruption. Companies buy one when travel volume makes unmanaged booking more expensive in leakage and time than the TMC's fees.
How much do travel management companies charge?
On the traditional model, GBTA benchmarks put loaded transaction fees at about $18 to $42 per online booking and $38 to $95 per agent assisted booking, plus management fees, totalling typically 2 to 5 percent of travel spend. Platform players charge differently: Navan's travel is free up to 300 employees, and Perk publishes tiers from free plus a booking percentage.
What happened to CWT?
American Express Global Business Travel acquired it. The deal was challenged by the US Department of Justice in January 2025, the department later dismissed its case, and Amex GBT completed the acquisition on 2 September 2025. CWT customers are now served inside Amex GBT.
Which TMC is best for a small company?
Perk and Navan are the natural shortlist: both onboard without an enterprise RFP, Perk with published tier pricing and European strength, Navan with free travel up to 300 employees and a strong traveller app. Direct Travel suits small programmes that want agent service included.
Is SAP Concur a travel management company?
It is primarily the platform: booking and expense software that many TMCs fulfil service through. Companies often run Concur for travel and expense while a TMC from this list provides agents, content and programme management on top, and its full travel tier is custom priced.
Sources we checked (0)
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.