How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- Answer engine optimization platforms differ from simple trackers by what happens after the measurement: Profound, Goodie AI and AthenaHQ all push toward fixes, agents and content actions, not just dashboards.
- Evertune is the measurement purist: it samples each prompt many times and publishes its margins of error, which is the honesty standard the rest of the category should be judged against.
- No platform can guarantee your brand is named or cited in AI answers. AEO improves the odds through sources, content and entity clarity; the engines still decide.
- Entry prices run from 50 dollars a month to enterprise contracts, and the unit that matters is still prompts across engines in your market, refreshed at a stated rate.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 Profound | Enterprise AEO programmes with agents | See website | No |
 Goodie AI | Measurement plus optimisation actions | $295 per month | No |
 Evertune | Statistically serious brand measurement | See website | No |
 AthenaHQ | Tracking with agent driven fixes | $295 per month | Yes |
 Writesonic | Visibility data joined to content production | $199 per month | No |
 AirOps | Content operations aimed at AI answers | See website | Yes |
 HubSpot AEO | HubSpot customers adding AI visibility | $50 per month | No |
 Conductor | Enterprise SEO suites extending into AEO | See website | No |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
#1Profound
Best for: Enterprise AEO programmes with agents4.6/5 on
G2 (640 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit tryprofound.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
What we like- Profound covers the full AEO loop at enterprise depth: prompt tracking across up to nine engines on its top tier, citation and source analysis, AI crawler analytics for your own site, prompt volume data for choosing what to chase, and agent features aimed at acting on the gaps it finds. It connects to publishing systems used by large content teams, and its agency packaging suits multi brand programmes. For a company treating AI answers as a channel, it is the reference platform.
Watch out for- Pricing is the barrier and the confusion: current comparisons place a ChatGPT only starter around 99 dollars a month and growth around 399, while enterprise runs through custom contracts, so treat every published figure as indicative and get a scoped quote. Depth this size needs a team to act on it. The trial is short, and a week of volatile answer data is a shaky base for a buying decision.
Starting price$295 per month
Free planNo
What we like- Goodie AI was built for this category rather than adapted to it. Core, at 295 dollars a month, covers five models and 110 prompts, with an optimisation hub that turns findings into prioritised actions: content changes, schema and entity suggestions, and prompt level fixes. Higher tiers widen model coverage toward commerce focused engines and add attribution that ties AI mentions to traffic and revenue claims, plus a brand check that flags claims AI makes about you against facts you set.
Watch out for- Gemini and Claude sit above the entry tier in current comparisons, so full engine coverage costs the Pro level at 999 dollars a month or enterprise. Its own published comparisons are marketing like everyone else's, so judge the actions on a trial. Attribution from AI answers to revenue is inherently approximate, because assistants strip referral data, and any platform's numbers there should be treated as directional.
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
What we like- Evertune's distinction is methodological. It samples each prompt many times, 100 samples at its stated standard, publishes margins of error for those sample sizes, and draws prompts partly from a panel of real consumer conversations, which produces measurement a brand team can defend in a boardroom. It combines API access with live consumer app results and is aimed at large advertisers and their agencies who treat AI answers as media.
Watch out for- Published pricing in current comparisons ranges from a small annual billed starter to an 800 dollar a month pro tier, so the only reliable figure is a quote for your brand set. It is measurement first: optimisation workflows and SEO style tooling are thinner than in Goodie or Profound. Smaller brands will find the statistical rigour admirable and the invoice hard to justify.
Starting price$295 per month
Free planYes
What we like- AthenaHQ pairs credit based tracking across a wide model list with agent driven actions and a citation analysis view, and connects to GA4 and Search Console so visibility sits beside the traffic data a team already reads. Its free tier, with a small credit allowance, lets a team validate the workflow on real prompts before the 295 dollar Starter tier and its 3,600 monthly credits. For growth teams wanting one platform from first test to working programme, the ladder is well built.
Watch out for- Credit metering means broad engine coverage consumes budget fast, and costs per response run higher than flat prompt plans at scale. API access costs extra on lower tiers in current comparisons. The action recommendations, like all such engines, need editorial judgement
- Following them mechanically produces formulaic content.
#5Writesonic
Best for: Visibility data joined to content production4.7/5 on
G2 (2,133 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit writesonic.com
Starting price$199 per month
Free planNo
What we like- Writesonic's GEO offering closes the loop for content teams: track visibility and citations, then use its action centre to edit and produce pages aimed at the gaps, inside the same product. Its Professional GEO plan runs at 199 dollars a month billed annually in its published comparison, covering ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews, with Perplexity and Claude on enterprise. Teams whose bottleneck is shipping content, not seeing data, get the most from the joined up model.
Watch out for- The writing engine is the risk as much as the feature: pages produced at volume to chase citations can drift into thin, formulaic content that serves neither engines nor readers, so human editing standards decide the outcome. Engine coverage on the GEO tier is narrower than the dedicated trackers. Entry pricing assumes annual billing.
Starting priceSee website
Free planYes
What we like- AirOps approaches AEO from the content operations side: research, briefs, scoring and agent driven production workflows designed to publish material structured for AI extraction, with visibility tracking for a growing engine set on higher plans. Content teams that already run production through workflows and approvals find it fits how they work, and it offers a free way to start. Its strength is throughput with process: many pages, each passed through research and review steps.
Watch out for- Published plan pricing is not public in current comparisons, so evaluation needs a sales conversation, and engine coverage on lower tiers is limited, with ChatGPT only at the entry level in one current breakdown. As with any production led tool, output quality is set by the briefs and review discipline you build, not by the platform. Pure measurement buyers will find heavier trackers better value.
Starting price$50 per month
Free planNo
What we like- HubSpot's AEO product puts AI visibility inside the CRM centred stack its customers already run: tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity from 50 dollars a month, with recommendations prioritised in the same interface as campaigns and contacts, and it is included with higher Marketing Hub tiers. Its free AI Search Grader gives any brand a one off snapshot before paying. For a mid market HubSpot shop, the absence of a new vendor is the feature.
Watch out for- Engine coverage is the narrowest here, and depth of citation analysis trails the dedicated platforms. Value collapses if you are not a HubSpot customer, because the product's logic is the bundle. Prompt allowances and refresh rates should be checked against dedicated rivals before assuming the cheaper sticker means cheaper measurement.
#8Conductor
Best for: Enterprise SEO suites extending into AEO4.5/5 on
G2 (826 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit conductor.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
What we like- Conductor brings AEO into an established enterprise SEO and content platform: AI visibility tracking across the main engines sits beside the rank, content and workflow data big organisations already run there, with agent and integration infrastructure aimed at enterprise stacks. For a company standardised on Conductor, AEO becomes an extension of an existing programme, with the governance and support that procurement departments ask for.
Watch out for- Pricing is custom and enterprise scaled, and the platform only makes sense bought as a suite. Its AEO layer is an addition to an SEO platform rather than the sole focus, so teams wanting the deepest answer engine specialisation will benchmark it against Profound and Goodie carefully. Implementation and onboarding follow enterprise timelines.
How we chose
We selected platforms in active sale in October 2026 that do more than report visibility: each had to analyse citations or sources and offer a path to action, through recommendations, agents, content tooling or publishing connections. Measurement honesty counted heavily; platforms describing sampling or refresh methods scored over those presenting single runs as fact. Scrunch is excluded under the standing editorial policy noted in earlier batches in this series. Prices came from vendor pages and October 2026 comparisons, and where they conflicted we wrote see website. Nothing was hands on tested.
Decide whether your constraint is seeing or doing. A brand with analysts and writers standing ready needs measurement depth and clean data export, which favours Evertune's sampling or Profound's analysis. A brand with data and no hands needs the action layer, which favours Goodie, AthenaHQ or Writesonic, provided editorial standards are enforced.
Then audit the measurement itself. Ask how many samples per prompt, which interface the answers come from, which market they represent, and how often they refresh. A platform that cannot answer those four questions is selling a dashboard, not a measurement. Finally, pilot on your real prompt set for a month and judge the platform by the actions it produced and whether acting on them moved your citations. AEO spend is justified by movement, not by the elegance of the reporting.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between AEO and SEO?
SEO works to rank pages in search results; AEO works to be named, described well and cited inside AI generated answers. They overlap heavily: the content quality, authority signals and source presence that drive rankings also feed answer engines. The practical difference is measurement. AEO tracks prompts and citations in engines such as ChatGPT and Perplexity rather than positions on a results page.
Can an AEO platform guarantee citations in AI answers?
No. The engines decide what to cite, and they change behaviour without notice. A platform can show which sources win citations in your category and help you earn a place among them. Guaranteed citation claims should end a sales conversation immediately.
How reliable is AI visibility data?
It depends on sampling. A single run of a prompt is close to anecdote, because answers vary between runs. Platforms that sample repeatedly and state their method, as Evertune does with published margins of error, produce trends you can act on. Whichever tool you use, judge it over months with a fixed prompt set, not week to week.
How much do AEO platforms cost?
Working platforms start around 50 to 295 dollars a month for smaller programmes, with enterprise platforms and wide engine coverage running to quoted contracts in the high hundreds and beyond. Compare what the tier buys in prompts, engines, markets and refresh rate, because those allowances differ more than the prices.
What actually improves a brand's AI visibility?
Being cited by the sources the engines already trust in your category, having clear, factual, well structured content about your products that an engine can extract, and keeping your brand's facts consistent across the web. The platforms prioritise and measure that work; they do not replace it, and there is no setting inside any of them that inserts your brand into an answer.
Sources we checked (0)
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.