How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- TEMS and Nemo Outdoor are the strongest drive test replacements, with proven data collection for mobile networks.
- Nemo Analyze and XCAL lead on post-processing, turning drive data into reports and maps.
- ROMES and SwissQual Benchmarker suit specialized testing, including benchmarking and quality measurement.
- Keysight Nemo Invex and RantCell offer modern and affordable options for smaller teams.
- Start with the job: collection, analysis, or benchmarking, since few tools lead on all three.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 TEMS | drive test data collection for operators | See website | No |
 Nemo Outdoor | field data collection across technologies | See website | No |
 Nemo Analyze | post-processing drive test data into reports | See website | No |
 XCAL | drive testing plus analysis in one platform | See website | No |
 ROMES | specialized drive testing with Rohde and Schwarz hardware | See website | No |
 SwissQual Diversity Benchmarker | benchmarking networks against competitors | See website | No |
 Keysight Nemo Invex | modern drive testing with cloud features | See website | No |
 RantCell | affordable network testing from phones | See website | Free trial |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
The best alternatives to actix
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
TEMS, from Infovista, is a drive test solution for collecting mobile network data in the field, covering voice, data, and video quality across technologies. It suits operators and engineering teams that need reliable collection with broad device support, including current smartphones and test devices. Data feeds into post-processing tools for analysis and reporting.
TEMS focuses on collection, so analysis needs companion tools such as TEMS Discovery or third-party platforms. Pricing is enterprise-level. For an operator team that needs proven, reliable drive test collection, TEMS is the most established pick here. Its device support is the reason large operators choose it.
What we like- Proven collection
- Broad device support
- Good for operators
Watch out for- Enterprise pricing
- Analysis needs companion tools
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Nemo Outdoor, from Keysight, collects drive test data across 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G, with voice, data, and video testing in one tool. It suits engineering teams that test mixed networks, since one setup covers legacy and current technologies. Device support is broad, and the tool is proven in operator and vendor testing worldwide.
Analysis needs Nemo Analyze, which pairs with Outdoor for post-processing. Pricing is enterprise-level. For a team that needs broad, reliable field collection, Nemo Outdoor is a strong rival to TEMS. Compare both on your device and technology mix before choosing.
What we like- Broad technology coverage
- Good device support
- Proven reliability
Watch out for- Enterprise pricing
- Analysis needs Nemo Analyze
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Nemo Analyze processes drive test data into maps, statistics, and reports, helping engineers find coverage gaps, interference, and quality problems. It pairs with Nemo Outdoor for collection, but it also imports data from other sources, which suits teams with mixed tool histories. Reporting covers voice quality, throughput, and event analysis.
Analyze needs collected data to work with, so it does not replace a collection tool on its own. Pricing is enterprise-level. For a team whose main Actix need is post-processing, Nemo Analyze is the closest functional replacement here. Its maps and reports are the features engineers use daily.
What we like- Strong analysis
- Good maps and reports
- Pairs with Outdoor
Watch out for- Needs collected data
- Enterprise pricing
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
XCAL, from Accuver, combines drive test collection with post-processing and analysis, covering voice, data, and video quality across technologies. Automation features support benchmark campaigns and repeatable tests, which suits operators and vendors that run regular testing programs. The platform also covers indoor testing and walk tests.
XCAL is a smaller brand than Keysight or Infovista, so support quality varies by region. For a team that wants collection and analysis in one platform at competitive pricing, XCAL is a strong pick. Test it on your network types during evaluation, since coverage varies.
What we like- Collection plus analysis
- Good automation
- Competitive pricing
Watch out for- Smaller brand than Keysight
- Support varies by region
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
ROMES, from Rohde and Schwarz, is a drive test platform that pairs software with the company's measurement hardware, offering precise, lab-grade measurements in the field. It suits vendors and operators that need high measurement accuracy, such as for 5G feature testing and device certification. The hardware integration gives measurement depth that phone-based tools cannot match.
Full value needs Rohde and Schwarz equipment, and pricing is enterprise-level. For a team that needs precise, hardware-backed measurements, ROMES is the most capable option here. For routine coverage testing, phone-based tools like TEMS or Nemo Outdoor will be simpler and cheaper.
What we like- Excellent hardware integration
- Precise measurements
- Strong for vendors
Watch out for- Enterprise pricing
- Needs Rohde and Schwarz equipment for full value
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
SwissQual Diversity Benchmarker, now part of Rohde and Schwarz, runs synchronized tests across multiple devices and networks, comparing operator performance side by side. That benchmarking focus suits regulators, operators, and analysts that rank networks on voice, data, and video quality. Reports are detailed and standardized, which supports public rankings and internal targets.
The focus is specialized: benchmarking, not general drive testing or post-processing. Pricing is enterprise-level. For a team whose main job is comparing networks fairly, the Benchmarker is the leading tool here. For general testing, pair it with a collection tool like TEMS or Nemo Outdoor.
What we like- Strong benchmarking
- Synchronized multi-device tests
- Good reports
Watch out for- Enterprise pricing
- Specialized focus
#7
Keysight Nemo Invex
Best for: modern drive testing with cloud features
Visit keysight.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Keysight Nemo Invex is a modern drive test platform with cloud-based data handling, real-time monitoring, and support for current devices and technologies. It suits teams that want drive testing with modern workflows, including remote monitoring and faster data sharing across engineers. The platform builds on Keysight's Nemo experience with a newer architecture.
Invex is newer than Nemo Outdoor, so long-term track records and third-party guides are fewer. Pricing is enterprise-level. For a team that wants modern drive testing with cloud features, Invex is a forward-looking pick. Compare it with Outdoor on your specific testing needs before choosing.
What we like- Modern platform
- Cloud data handling
- Good device support
Watch out for- Enterprise pricing
- Newer platform than Outdoor
Starting priceSee website
Free planFree trial
RantCell offers phone-based network testing at a low cost, with apps that measure voice, data, and coverage from ordinary smartphones. That affordability suits small teams, startups, and researchers that need network measurements without enterprise tool budgets. Setup is fast, and results upload to a cloud dashboard for analysis.
Depth is less than enterprise tools: no specialized hardware, fewer test types, and lighter post-processing. For a small team that needs basic network measurements on a budget, RantCell is the best affordable pick here. It also suits crowdsourced testing, where many phones contribute data.
What we like- Low cost
- Phone-based testing
- Easy setup
Watch out for- Less depth than enterprise tools
- Limited hardware options
How we chose
We compared these tools on collection, post-processing, benchmarking, device support, pricing, and fit for different team sizes. We checked vendor pages and public comparison guides, and where pricing was not published we wrote See website instead of guessing. We kept the list to tools a real telecom team can buy today, and we left out tools that only cover one narrow measurement task. We also weighed reporting flexibility, since engineers need custom maps and statistics for their specific networks, not just fixed report templates.
How to pick an Actix replacement for your testing program
Start with the job split. Collection needs TEMS, Nemo Outdoor, XCAL, ROMES, or RantCell. Post-processing needs Nemo Analyze or XCAL. Benchmarking needs SwissQual Benchmarker. Most teams need at least two tools, so budget for a collection plus analysis pair rather than expecting one tool to cover everything.
Next, check device and technology coverage for your networks. A tool that lacks your current devices or 5G features will fail on real campaigns, no matter how good its reports look. Test with your actual devices and network types during evaluation, including indoor and rural routes, since those stress tools most.
Finally, compare total cost including devices, licenses, and analysis seats, since enterprise tools price each part separately. Also check data formats and export options, since locked-in data formats make switching tools painful later. A tool that exports cleanly protects your testing history.
Also check data quality controls before trusting results. Drive test data depends on GPS accuracy, device calibration, and route planning, so ask each vendor how it handles GPS drift, missing samples, and device differences. A tool that flags poor-quality samples and explains them will give more trustworthy reports than one that silently includes bad data. Plan routes that cover your real problem areas, including indoor locations and rural roads, since easy urban routes hide the problems customers actually experience.
Frequently asked questions
What is Actix used for?
Actix, now part of Infovista, provides drive test post-processing and analysis, turning field measurements into maps, statistics, and reports for mobile operators. Teams replacing it usually need the same analysis, or a combined collection plus analysis platform, from another vendor.
Which alternative is closest to Actix?
Nemo Analyze is closest for post-processing alone, while XCAL is closest for a combined collection plus analysis platform. TEMS Discovery, from Infovista, is the direct successor path for existing Actix users, so check that option as well.
Do I need separate collection and analysis tools?
Often, yes. Collection tools gather field data, while analysis tools process it into reports. Some platforms like XCAL combine both, while TEMS and Nemo split them across products. Budget for both sides when planning a replacement, and confirm that collection output imports cleanly into your chosen analysis tool before buying either in advance. Test the import early with real sample data files.
What devices do drive test tools support?
Support varies by tool and version, covering current smartphones, test devices, and specialized scanners. Check support for your exact devices and technologies before buying, since a missing device can block an entire campaign. Also confirm how quickly the vendor adds new devices after launch, since a tool that lags on new models will fall behind as your fleet updates.
Can phone apps replace enterprise drive test tools?
For basic measurements, yes. RantCell and similar phone apps cover coverage and speed checks at low cost. For precise, repeatable, and benchmark-grade testing, enterprise tools with dedicated devices and hardware still lead. Phone apps also vary by handset, since different phones report signal differently, so compare results across identical models when accuracy matters, and treat crowdsourced phone data as directional rather than exact.
How do I benchmark networks fairly?
Use synchronized tests across devices and networks, identical routes and times, and standardized metrics for voice, data, and video. Tools like SwissQual Benchmarker automate that fairness, while manual comparisons risk bias from different conditions. Repeat tests on different days and times, since a single run can reflect a temporary fault rather than normal performance, and publish your method alongside results, so readers can judge whether the comparison was fair.
Sources we checked (5)
- https://www.infovista.com
- https://www.keysight.com
- https://www.accuver.com
- https://www.rohde-schwarz.com
- https://rantcell.com
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.