Rankite
ServicesResultsToolsTeamAboutBlogCareersContactFree SEO Audit
Free tool

Core Web Vitals Checker: Do You Pass Google's Thresholds?

Enter your Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint and Cumulative Layout Shift scores from PageSpeed Insights or Search Console, and see instantly which ones pass Google's published thresholds.

Home / Tools / Core Web Vitals Checker
LCP
-
INP
-
CLS
-
Overall
-

Thresholds match Google's published Core Web Vitals targets: LCP under 2.5s, INP under 200ms, CLS under 0.1 are all rated good.

Built by Rankite, the SEO team behind Swordfish AI's +400% revenue and Zluri's +45% organic growth. See the case studies

A Core Web Vitals checker takes the LCP, INP and CLS numbers you already have from PageSpeed Insights or Search Console and tells you instantly which ones pass Google's published thresholds, without needing to interpret three separate scales yourself.

The three metrics explained

Largest Contentful Paint measures loading speed, tracking how long the biggest visible element takes to render. Interaction to Next Paint measures responsiveness, tracking the delay between a user action and the page's next visual update. Cumulative Layout Shift measures visual stability, tracking how much content jumps around unexpectedly while the page loads. Google needs all three in the good range for a page to count as passing.

Why the thresholds matter

Google sets a good, needs-improvement and poor band for each metric based on research into what users actually perceive as fast or slow. A page can look fine to you on a quick desktop connection while still failing INP for the many visitors on slower phones and networks, which is why field data from real users matters more than a single lab test.

Fixing common issues

Slow LCP is usually a large hero image, render-blocking CSS or JavaScript, or a slow server response. Poor INP is often heavy JavaScript that blocks the main thread during interactions, especially on pages with a lot of client-side rendering. Layout shift is most often caused by images or ads without a reserved size, or fonts that swap in late and push content down. Fixing the biggest offender first usually moves the overall verdict from poor to needs improvement or good, which supports the kind of technical foundation behind solid technical SEO.

Related articles

FAQ

Core Web Vitals Checker: questions, answered

What are Core Web Vitals?
Core Web Vitals are three metrics Google uses to measure real-world page experience: Largest Contentful Paint for loading speed, Interaction to Next Paint for responsiveness, and Cumulative Layout Shift for visual stability. Google publishes a good, needs-improvement and poor threshold for each one.
What is a good LCP score?
Largest Contentful Paint should be 2.5 seconds or faster to be rated good. Between 2.5 and 4 seconds is needs improvement, and anything above 4 seconds is poor. LCP measures how long it takes the largest visible element, usually a hero image or heading, to render.
What is INP and how is it different from FID?
Interaction to Next Paint measures the time between a user's interaction, such as a click or tap, and the next visual update on screen. It replaced First Input Delay as an official Core Web Vital because it accounts for the full interaction, not just the initial delay. A good INP score is 200 milliseconds or under.
What is a good CLS score?
Cumulative Layout Shift should be 0.1 or lower to be rated good. It measures how much visible content unexpectedly shifts position while a page loads, which is often caused by images or ads without reserved space, or web fonts that load late and reflow the layout.
Do Core Web Vitals affect Google rankings?
Page experience is a confirmed, if minor, ranking factor, and Google has described it as more of a tiebreaker between pages that are otherwise similarly relevant. Content quality and relevance still matter far more, but poor Core Web Vitals can also hurt conversions and user satisfaction regardless of ranking impact.
How do I measure my real Core Web Vitals scores?
Google Search Console's Core Web Vitals report and PageSpeed Insights both show field data collected from real Chrome users, which is what Google actually uses for ranking. Lab tools like Lighthouse are useful for debugging but reflect a single simulated test, not real visitor conditions, so field data should be your source of truth.

More free tools

Let's grow

Ready to own page one?

Get a free, no-obligation SEO audit and a 30-minute strategy session. We'll show you exactly where the growth is hiding.

Book your free audit Explore services
Get in touch

Tell us about your project

Fill out the form and we'll get back to you within one business day. Prefer email? Write to us directly at contact@rankite.com.

Or copy our email and write to us directly: contact@rankite.com