How we make this list: we compare pricing pages, product documentation and public user reviews. Ratings come from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, with the date we checked them.
Key takeaways
- Teamtailor leads on employer branding and career sites, but pricing is quote-only with no free trial, only a demo.
- Workable and Ashby publish pricing, at $299 and $400 per month respectively, with broad ATS and analytics coverage.
- Breezy HR and Manatal suit small teams, with a free plan and $15 per user monthly respectively.
- Pricing models differ: flat monthly, per user, per job slot, and quote-based, so compare at your real hiring volume.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|
 Workable | Broad SMB ATS | $299/month | No |
 Ashby | Data-led recruiting | $400/month | No |
 Breezy HR | Small-team start | $157/month | Yes |
 Manatal | Low per-user cost | $15/user/month | No |
 Greenhouse | Structured enterprise hiring | See website | No |
 Recruitee | European collaborative hiring | See website | No |
 Pinpoint | UK and EU data hosting | See website | No |
 100Hires | Simple plan pricing | $49/month | No |
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
The best teamtailor alternatives
Starting price$299/month
Free planNo
Workable is the broadest self-serve ATS here, posting to 200-plus job boards and managing the whole hiring process from sourcing to offer, with Workable Agent AI and 3,000 free AI credits on paid accounts. Small and mid-size businesses use it as one tool for the whole process without enterprise complexity. For a broad ATS with a public price, Workable leads.
Standard starts from $299 per month in recent listings, though older comparisons cite $149, so confirm the current pricing page. The trial runs 15 days. For broad SMB hiring, Workable is the top pick.
What we like- 200-plus job boards
- 3,000 free AI credits on paid accounts
- Broadest job-board reach here
Watch out for- Less employer-branding depth than Teamtailor
- Standard pricing varies by source
- 15-day trial only
#2Ashby
Best for: Data-led recruiting4.7/5 on
G2 (212 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit ashbyhq.com
Starting price$400/month
Free planNo
Ashby combines ATS, CRM, and analytics in one platform, with AI-assisted application review against job criteria and the highest reporting and analytics scores in recent comparisons. Data-led teams use it to replace spreadsheets with live recruiting analytics. For recruiting analytics without spreadsheets, Ashby leads.
Foundations costs $400 per month for up to 100 employees, with larger tiers quoted. For data-led recruiting, Ashby is the pick.
What we like- ATS plus CRM plus analytics in one
- AI-assisted application review
- Highest reporting scores here
Watch out for- Quote above small-company tiers
- Analytics depth needs setup
- Higher entry price
#3Breezy HR
Best for: Small-team start4.4/5 on
G2 (695 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit breezy.hr
Starting price$157/month
Free planYes
Breezy HR suits very small teams with a free Bootstrap plan covering one open job and paid plans from $157 per month billed yearly for unlimited users. Visual pipelines and simple workflows make it easy for every manager to get a login. For a free or low-cost start, Breezy HR wins.
It does not scale to large teams, and deeper features need higher tiers. For small-team hiring, Breezy HR is the pick.
What we like- Free Bootstrap plan for one open job
- Flat $157 monthly for unlimited users
- Visual pipelines
Watch out for- Not for large teams
- Paid features behind higher tiers
- Smaller integration library
#4Manatal
Best for: Low per-user cost4.8/5 on
G2 (147 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit manatal.com
Starting price$15/user/month
Free planNo
Manatal offers the lowest cost for teams under 10 seats, at $15 per user per month billed annually, with AI recommendations on the entry plan and a 14-day trial. Lean recruiting teams and staffing agencies use it for AI-powered ATS and CRM at a low per-user price. For low-cost AI recruiting, Manatal leads.
It is leaner than Workable or Ashby, with a staffing-agency tilt. For small teams on a budget, Manatal is the value pick.
What we like- Lowest per-user cost here
- AI recommendations on entry plan
- 14-day trial
Watch out for- Leaner than Workable or Ashby
- Staffing-agency focus
- Support depth varies
#5Greenhouse
Best for: Structured enterprise hiring4.4/5 on
G2 (4,033 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit greenhouse.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Greenhouse suits larger organizations needing consistent interviews across large panels, with interview plans, scorecards, advanced analytics, and compliance tools, plus the top integration score in recent comparisons. Enterprises use it for structured hiring at scale. For structured enterprise hiring, Greenhouse leads.
Pricing is quote-only with complex setup and high cost for small teams. For enterprise structured hiring, Greenhouse is the pick.
What we like- Consistent interviews across large panels
- Interview plans and scorecards
- Top integration scores
Watch out for- Quote-only pricing
- Complex setup
- High cost for small teams
#6Recruitee
Best for: European collaborative hiring4.5/5 on
G2 (461 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit recruitee.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Recruitee, now part of Tellent, suits European mid-market teams hiring collaboratively across departments, with EU-only hosting on Google Cloud in Frankfurt and Berlin and ISO 27001 certification. Screening Assistant runs on Advance and Optimize plans. For EU-hosted collaborative hiring, Recruitee fits.
Pricing is quote-only with a one-year minimum contract. For European collaborative hiring, Recruitee is the pick.
What we like- EU-only hosting in Frankfurt and Berlin
- Collaborative hiring across departments
- Screening Assistant
Watch out for- Quote-only pricing
- One-year minimum contract
- European focus over global reach
#7Pinpoint
Best for: UK and EU data hosting4.6/5 on
G2 (167 reviews, checked Oct 2026)
Visit pinpoint.com
Starting priceSee website
Free planNo
Pinpoint suits UK teams wanting UK and EU data centres and UK support, with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certification, opt-in AI criteria checklists, filters, and match scores. For UK and EU data hosting with local support, Pinpoint leads.
Pricing is quote-only, and the focus is UK rather than global. For UK teams, Pinpoint is the pick.
What we like- UK and EU data centres in Amsterdam, Dublin, and London
- UK support
- AI criteria checklists
Watch out for- Quote-only pricing
- UK focus over global reach
- Smaller ecosystem than Workable
Starting price$49/month
Free planNo
100Hires suits small and mid-size in-house teams that liked Teamtailor simplicity but not its slot maths, pricing by plan rather than job slots: Start at $49 per month billed annually ($99 monthly) for up to 100 candidates monthly, Advanced at $199 annually ($249 monthly) for unlimited jobs, candidates, and users, and Pro at $399 annually ($499 monthly) adding sourcing and enrichment. For simple plan pricing, 100Hires wins.
It is not an employer-branding upgrade over Teamtailor, careers pages are clean but basic, and it is not built for agencies. For simple ATS pricing, 100Hires is the pick.
What we like- Simple plan pricing, not job slots
- 4.9 out of 5 from 1,100-plus Capterra reviews
- Unlimited jobs on Advanced
Watch out for- Not an employer-branding upgrade
- Clean but basic careers pages
- Not built for agencies
How we chose
We compared career-site quality, job-board reach, screening AI, analytics, data hosting, and pricing transparency for each tool, then checked them against recent Teamtailor alternative comparisons with data verified in 2026. Tools made the list only if hiring teams can post jobs and manage candidates today with a published or widely reported offering. Where pricing sits behind a quote or varies by listing, we used See website rather than printing a contested figure. We also weighed pricing models separately, since flat monthly, per-user, per-slot, and quote-based bills diverge sharply at the same hiring volume. We also checked AI screening transparency, since opt-in checklists with candidate evidence differ from opaque ranking: prefer tools that show which criteria a candidate met and what evidence supports each match.
Different teams leave Teamtailor for different reasons. If the problem is application volume, look at screening depth: Manatal AI recommendations, Ashby AI-assisted review, and Pinpoint AI checklists all rank candidates against criteria. If the problem is the careers site, no tool here beats Teamtailor branding, so weigh whether a simpler site plus a stronger ATS is an acceptable trade. If the problem is price opacity, Workable, Ashby, Breezy HR, Manatal, and 100Hires all publish pricing, while Greenhouse, Recruitee, and Pinpoint quote.
Also confirm data hosting and consent handling before migrating: export candidates, jobs, templates, and consent records first, and check the new ATS can import consent dates so retention rules keep working. Keep Teamtailor live until the new system has handled one full hire, since a failed migration mid-search costs more than a month of overlap. Also test interview scheduling and feedback collection during the trial, since those workflows decide daily recruiter happiness more than any careers-page demo: Confirm calendar sync, panel feedback, and offer-letter handling on real requisitions before signing. Also confirm user-seat rules, since unlimited-user plans like Teamtailor and Breezy HR paid differ sharply from per-user plans like Manatal: a 25-user hiring team pays far more per user than a 5-user team, so model the bill at your actual headcount, not at the entry tier. Request written quotes from at least three vendors with identical hiring requirements before signing anything final. Compare total cost at your real user count and job volume, not at entry tiers today.
Frequently asked questions
What is Teamtailor and what does it cost?
Teamtailor is a recruitment platform combining applicant tracking with employer branding tools, offering customizable career pages, automation, and unlimited users in its base package, with AI tools for resume screening, job ad creation, and candidate matching. Pricing is not published: the pricing page says "Let us give you a quote" and promises unlimited job postings and unlimited users across 250-plus features, with no free trial, only a demo. Buyer-reported figures run around $229 per month and $2,750 per year.
Which Teamtailor alternative is best for employer branding?
No tool here beats Teamtailor on employer branding: its career sites, content blocks, and design control are genuinely stronger than rivals, including 100Hires, which states plainly it is not the branding upgrade. Workable and Ashby offer solid career pages with stronger ATS and analytics depth. If branding is the core reason you chose Teamtailor, staying or pairing it with a sourcing tool may beat switching.
Which Teamtailor alternative is cheapest for small teams?
Breezy HR free covers one open job, and 100Hires Start costs $49 per month billed annually for up to 100 candidates monthly. Manatal costs $15 per user monthly, which works out to $150 for 10 users, while Breezy HR paid costs $157 flat for unlimited users. For a 20-employee company with 10 users, Manatal at $150 and Breezy HR at $157 are the cheapest paid options here. Also note that free plans cover only one open job each on Breezy HR and Zoho Recruit, so teams hiring for multiple roles at once need a paid tier from the start.
Which Teamtailor alternative is best for UK or EU data hosting?
Pinpoint hosts in Amsterdam, Dublin, and London with UK support, while Recruitee hosts EU-only in Frankfurt and Berlin. Both carry ISO 27001 certification, with Pinpoint adding SOC 2 Type II. For UK teams, Pinpoint leads; for EU-only hosting, Recruitee fits.
How do I move off Teamtailor safely?
Export candidates, jobs, templates, and consent records first, and check the new ATS can import consent dates so retention rules keep working. Keep Teamtailor live until the new system has handled one full hire. If the shortlist is the real issue rather than the ATS itself, connect a sourcing tool to Teamtailor through integrations before moving. Also confirm job-board distribution for your markets, since Workable wins on widest reach while Teamtailor wins on European localization with local-language career pages. Also confirm contract terms for quote-based tools, since Recruitee requires a one-year minimum and several enterprise ATS vendors lock multi-year terms: prefer monthly or annual terms with a clear exit path unless the discount justifies the lock-in.
Sources we checked (8)
- https://workable.com
- https://www.ashbyhq.com
- https://breezy.hr
- https://www.manatal.com
- https://www.greenhouse.com
- https://recruitee.com
- https://www.pinpoint.com
- https://100hires.com
Is your product missing or out of date?
We review this list regularly. Vendors can request a listing, send updated pricing or ask about featured placement.
Shihab Mia · Founder, Rankite
Shihab has 5+ years in B2B and SaaS SEO. He writes Rankite's software buying guides from pricing pages, documentation and public user reviews. More about Shihab.